Results of 2017 Survey on Nebraska Soybean Farmers’ Adoption of Xtend Technology and Off-Target Dicamba Movement December 14, 2017
In 2017 the Xtend soybean technology was completely launched in the United States (that is, the Environmental Protection Agency approved the dicamba-resistant seed trait and postemergence application of labeled dicamba formulations). According to the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 5.7 million acres of soybeans were planted in Nebraska in 2017, of which approximately 500,000 were planted to Xtend soybean varieties (https://cropwatch.unl.edu/2017/dicamba-injury-symptoms-sensitive-crops).
During the 2017 growing season, the Nebraska Department of Agriculture received 90 claims of dicamba injury in non-Xtend soybeans. However, Nebraska Extension Educators compiled a total of 348 claims from across the state, representing approximately 50,000 acres of non-Xtend soybeans injured by dicamba (Amit Jhala, personal communication).
In summer 2017 we conducted a survey of Nebraska soybean farmers’ perceptions on dicamba use in Xtend soybeans. The survey was conducted in two formats:
- Printed surveys were handed out during the 2017 Soybean Management Field Days, held at four major soybean growing areas of Nebraska (August 08-11 at North Platte, Ord, Auburn, and Tekamah, respectively).
- An online survey linked from CropWatch was available from August 18 through September 18 via SurveyMonkey.
The survey was comprised of three main sections:
- Demographics of participants
- Outcomes from dicamba application in Xtend soybeans
- Perceived dicamba injury in non-Xtend soybeans
The results presented here represent the opinions and observations of Nebraska farmers and not University of Nebraska-Lincoln weed scientists and Nebraska Extension educators. To avoid redundancy, only responses from those who described themselves as farmers were used. Results are expressed as a percentage of either total answers or total acres represented for each question (not every question was answered by all participants).
- 312 farmers from 60 Nebraska counties participated in the survey, representing a total of 192,301 acres of soybeans grown in 2017 (Figure 1).
- Of these, in 2017, 71% of soybean producers sprayed their own herbicide programs.
- In 2017 19% of the total acres represented in the survey were planted with Xtend varieties. For 2018, farmers anticipate planting 52% of their soybean acres with Xtend varieties.
- In 2017, 73% of the Xtend soybean acres were treated postemergence with dicamba. For 2018, farmers anticipate 88% of the Xtend soybean acres will be sprayed postemergence with dicamba.
Outcomes from Dicamba Application in Xtend Soybeans in 2017
- 55%, 38%, and 7% of the surveyed Xtend soybean acres that were treated postemergence with dicamba were sprayed with Xtendimax, Engenia, and Fexipan, respectively. No farmer reported the use of a non-approved dicamba formulation for postemergence application in Xtend soybeans.
- 93% of farmers reported significant improvement in weed management with the use of the Xtend technology.
- In terms of postemergence programs, 58% of Xtend acres were treated with either dicamba alone or dicamba in tank mix with glyphosate. The remaining 42% were treated with a more diversified postemergence program including additional herbicide sites of action.
- 18% of respondents reported that their dicamba application in Xtend soybeans injured neighboring non-Xtend soybean fields (volatility was believed to be the main cause of off-target dicamba movement followed by particle drift); 9% were not sure and 73% were confident that no injury was caused by their application.
- The overall likelihood, based on survey responses, for dicamba injury in neighboring non-Xtend soybeans in 2017 increased when dicamba was sprayed late-June/July when compared to applications from May through mid-June (Figure 2).
Perceived Dicamba Injury in Non-Xtend Soybeans in 2017
- 50% of respondents reported dicamba injury in their non-Xtend soybeans; however, the total injured acreage was 13%.
- The suspected causes of injury were: tank-contamination (6%), off-target dicamba movement from application in Xtend soybeans (64%), and off-target dicamba movement from late applications in corn (30%). For off-target dicamba movement from applications in Xtend soybeans and corn, volatility was believed to be the main cause followed by particle drift.
- 93% of respondents who had non-Xtend soybeans injured by dicamba did not file a claim with the Nebraska Department of Agriculture.
Take-Home Messages from Survey Results
- Nebraska Xtend soybean acres sprayed with dicamba are expected to increase significantly in 2018.
- Farmers who adopted the technology in 2017 observed significant improvement in weed control.
- Almost 60% of Xtend soybean acres represented in this survey were treated postemergence with dicamba alone or when tank-mixed with glyphosate. Glyphosate-resistant weeds are widespread across the soybean production areas of Nebraska and managing these troublesome weeds with dicamba alone is not a sustainable strategy from a herbicide-resistance management standpoint.
- Most farmers spray their own herbicide programs; therefore, proper training on dicamba handling and application is crucial to minimize application errors. If applicators decide to buy and spray dicamba in Xtend soybeans in 2018, they must attend Auxin Herbicide Training. (More information on the training will be published in CropWatch in January.)
- Off-target dicamba movement in Nebraska in 2017 was believed to occur not only from applications in Xtend soybeans, but also from applications in corn (most likely from late postemergence applications for control of common waterhemp and Palmer amaranth). Therefore, applicators should be mindful not only when spraying dicamba in Xtend soybeans but also in other crops.
- Nebraska soybean farmers believe that volatility played an important role in off-target dicamba movement during the 2017 growing season.
- Late postemergence applications of dicamba were more likely to result in non-Xtend soybean injury when compared to burndown and early postemergence applications.
We would like to acknowledge Keith Glewen (UNL Extension Educator), Lisa Jasa (CropWatch Editor), and Gustavo Vieira (UNL Visiting Undergraduate Student) for their assistance with the survey. A special thanks to all survey participants for their time answering the questions and providing us valuable feedback.