Scout Fields for Aspergillus Ear Rot to Avoid Losses to Aflatoxin Contamination
August 23, 2012
Table 1: FDA action levels for aflatoxin contamination in corn intended for livestock. | |
Commodity Action Level | (ppb) |
Finishing (feedlot) beef cattle | 300 |
Finishing swine of 100 pounds or greater | 200 |
Breeding beef cattle, breeding swine, or mature poultry | 100 |
Immature animals and dairy cattle | 20 |
For animal species or uses not otherwise specified, or when the intended use is not known | 20 |
Human food | 20 |
Source: FDA Action Levels for Aflatoxin |
The unusually high temperatures and drought this summer are having severe impacts on Nebraska corn. In addition to reductions in test weight and overall yield, secondary problems are developing in some corn fields as a result of these conditions.
Drought and high temperatures promote development of the disease Aspergillus ear rot (Figure 1). The fungi that cause this disease (most commonly, Aspergillus flavus) can produce aflatoxin. Aflatoxin is one of many chemicals in a group known as mycotoxins that are produced by fungi (molds). Mycotoxins, such as aflatoxin, can be toxic to animal and human consumers and, at certain concentrations, can lead to dockage or rejection of grain at elevators.
Corn harvested for grain to this point has been predominantly from fields that sustained substantial drought damage leading to early maturation and plant death. Notable aflatoxin contamination appears to be in a small percentage of southeast Nebraska fields, based on samples submitted to several laboratories in the area.
Mycotoxins are common and can be safely consumed at low concentrations. The concentration of aflatoxin that is considered safe for consumption depends on the age and species of the consumer. An abbreviated summary listing the Action Levels identified by the FDA for aflatoxin is listed in Table 1.
Testing for Aflatoxin
Farmers and crop consultants can scout high risk fields for Aspergillus ear rot as an indicator for aflatoxin, but only lab testing of grain samples can accurately identify the concentrations of aflatoxin in the grain. Accurate lab test results for aflatoxin will depend greatly on the quality of the sample that is collected and the laboratory methods used to test it. The test results are only applicable to the sample that is submitted, so it is very important to collect an adequate sample for the best results. Refer to the publication, Sampling and Analyzing Feed for Fungal (Mold) Toxins (Mycotoxins) for recommendations on how to collect and submit a high quality sample for mycotoxin analysis.
Contact and submit samples to a laboratory that is certified by the federal Grain Inspection Service and Grain Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) for mycotoxin analysis for the most accurate results. A GIPSA website lists laboratories certified to conduct testing in Nebraska. They include
- Fremont Grain Inspection, 603 East Dodge St., Fremont, 402-721-1270; email fgid@neb.rr.com
- Hastings Grain Inspection, 306 E. Park St., Hastings, 402-462-4254; email Hastings at hgihast@hastingsgrain.com; email Grand Island office at hginsp@hastingsgrain.com
- Kansas Grain Inspection Service, 517 13th Ave., Sidney, Nebr., 308-254-3975; email
- Lincoln Inspection Service, 505 Garfield St., Lincoln, 402-435-4386; email lismf@neb.rr.com
- Omaha Grain Inspection Service, 2525 South 13th St., 402-341-6739; omahagrain@gmail.com
- Sioux CIty Inspection and Weighing Service, 840 Clark St., Sioux City, Iowa, 712-255-8073; email tomd@scigrain.com
A multi-state list of service facilities certified by GIPSA is also available.
Some grain elevators and individuals may be using a black light (ultraviolet light) to detect for fluorescence as a method for rapid screening of grain samples. This practice is NOT recommended when making decisions about aflatoxin contamination in loads of grain. The component that produces fluorescence under black light is called kojic acid. Although kojic acid is produced by the same fungus that produces aflatoxin, its presence is not necessarily an indicator of aflatoxin and might lead to false positive results and unnecessary rejection of grain.
High Risk Factors for Aflatoxin Contamination in Corn
- Drought-damaged fields, including rainfed (dryland) fields and non-irrigated pivot corners
- Fields or areas with higher incidence of corn ear-feeding insects, such as the corn ear worm
- Grain damaged before or during harvest or after harvest while in storage
On this week's Market Journal, UNL Extension Plant Pathologist Tamra Jackson and UNL Diagnostic Toxicologist/ Michael Carlson discuss mycotoxins in corn and possible ramifications.
Scouting For Aspergillus Ear Rot
On this week's Market Journal, UNL Extension Plant Pathologist Tamra Jackson and UNL Diagnostic Toxicologist/ Michael Carlson discuss mycotoxins in corn and possible ramifications.
Ear rot diseases and aflatoxin are not evenly distributed across fields or in the grain, so scouting and/or sampling should include a substantial portion, at least several acres. The presence of the fungus in kernels does not always correlate well with the presence of aflatoxin, nor does the absence of visible fungal growth necessarily indicate the absence of aflatoxin.
- Open husks to view a large number of ears.
- Look for the presence of dusty yellow-green to olive-green spores, especially on the surface of damaged kernels or ear tips (Figure 1).
- Pay special attention to higher risk areas.
Harvest and Storage
If fields have documented Aspergillus ear rot and/or risk of aflatoxin contamination, it is recommended that you harvest and keep grain separate from other grain at less risk, such as irrigated fields. Storage of affected grain is not recommended because ear rot diseases and mycotoxins can continue to accumulate during storage. If storage is necessary, cooling and drying grain to less than 15% moisture within 48 hours of harvest will help to slow fungal growth and aflatoxin production. Grain intended to be stored for longer periods of time should be dried to less than 13% moisture.
Presently, it is too early in the harvest to know the extent of aflatoxin contamination in this year's corn crop, but at this time only a small percentage appears to be affected.
Resources
For more information, refer to the list of publications below or view this week's episode of Market Journal.
- Plant Disease Profiles #3: Ear Rot Diseases and Grain Molds, EC1901
- Understanding Fungal (Mold) Toxins (Mycotoxins), G1513
- Sampling and Analyzing Feed for Fungal (Mold) Toxins (Mycotoxins), G1515
- Use of Feed Contaminated with Fungal (Mold) Toxins (Mycotoxins), G1514
- Aspergillus Ear Rot and Aflatoxin Production, Iowa State University Integrated Crop Management News
- Check Cornfields for Aspergillus Ear Rot, University of Illinois the Bulletin
Tamra Jackson-Ziems
UNL Extension Plant Pathologist
Online Master of Science in Agronomy
With a focus on industry applications and research, the online program is designed with maximum flexibility for today's working professionals.