2026 Corn Yield Forecasts as of Aug. 4

August 6, 2026

2026 Corn Yield Forecasts as of Aug. 4

By Patricio Grassini - Professor of Agronomy and Horticulture, and Cropping Systems Specialist, Jose Andrade - UNL Affiliate, Fernando Aramburu Merlos - UNL Affiliate, Haishun Yang - UNL Associate Professor of Agronomy and Horticulture, Jenny Brhel - Extension Educator, Jeff Coulter - Professor and Extension Specialist, University of Minnesota, Mark Licht - ISU Associate Professor, Extension Cropping System Specialist, Sotirios Archontoulis - ISU Professor, Maninder Pal Singh - Michigan State University Associate Professor of Cropping Systems Agronomy, Osler Ortez - Ohio State University Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Assistant Professor, Daniel Quinn - Assistant Professor of Agronomy and Extension Corn Specialist, Purdue University, Ana Carcedo - Assistant Professor and Extension Agronomist, North Dakota State University

2026 corn yield forecasts map overlayed on a green field background with Nebraska's logo.

How have recent weather conditions affected corn yield prospects? The latest Hybrid-Maize forecast offers an updated outlook across the U.S. Corn Belt.


Key Takeaways
  • Irrigated corn: Near- to below-average yields are expected due to above-average nighttime temperatures during flowering and early grain filling. 

  • Rainfed corn: Yield prospects remain strongest across the central and eastern Corn Belt, while western areas face a greater risk of below-average yields. 

  • Looking ahead: Late-season temperature and rainfall will be critical in determining final yield potential. 


Corn across much of the U.S. Corn Belt has progressed into the grain-filling stages, and weather conditions during the remainder of the season will continue to shape end-of-season yield potential.

Simulations of corn growth and end-of-season yield potential were completed on Aug. 4 for 43 locations across the U.S. Corn Belt using the UNL Hybrid-Maize crop model in collaboration with faculty and Extension educators from 10 universities. Simulated crop stages and yield forecasts for each location are provided in Table 1.

This article summarizes the simulated crop stages and yield forecasts. Details on the UNL Hybrid-Maize crop model, the methodology used to simulate crop development and forecast end-of-season yields, and guidance on interpreting and using these forecasts are available in a previous article.

Above-average temperatures, especially at night, were observed in the central, western, and northern regions of the Corn Belt, while the eastern region (Indiana, Missouri, Ohio) experienced near-normal temperatures. High temperatures can lead to a shorter grain filling duration. In addition, nighttime temperatures exceeding 70°F increase crop respiration and can reduce crop growth

Rainfall was below average in the northern (North Dakota and northern Minnesota), central (western Iowa and Illinois), and south-central (Missouri) regions. In contrast, above-average rainfall was recorded in northeastern kansas. A summary of weather conditions during the past three weeks is shown in Figure 1.

Bar charts with red points showing solar radiation, temperatures, rainfall, and evapotranspiration across U.S. states.
Figure 1. Daily solar radiation, maximum and minimum air temperature (Tmax and Tmin), total rainfall, and total reference grass-based evapotranspiration (ET) for the time-period between July 14 and Aug. 3. Vertical bars indicate the range for these variables based on more than 20 years of weather records. The horizontal thick line indicates the long-term average and the red dots indicate the 2026 values for the same period.  
Table 1. Data from simulations of 2026 end-of-season corn yield potential and real-time crop stage performed on Aug. 4.
StateCityWater regime

Long-term average yield

(bu/ac) §

Range of Yp forecasts as of Aug 4 (bu/ac)?

25th

Range of Yp forecasts as of Aug 4 (bu/ac)?

75th 

Probability (%) of 2026 yield to be: 

Below 

(relative to the long-term Yp)†

Probability (%) of 2026 yield to be: 

Near 

(relative to the long-term Yp)†

Probability (%) of 2026 yield to be:

Above 

(relative to the long-term Yp)†

Simulated current crop stage*
NEAllianceIrrigated23021523827%48%24%R4, Dough
NEBeatriceDryland18314115791%8%0%R4, Dough
NEBeatriceIrrigated24021122191%8%0%R4, Dough
NEClay CenterDryland18917822811%45%43%R4, Dough
NEClay CenterIrrigated25824826915%63%20%R4, Dough
NEConcordDryland20319423111%47%40%R4, Dough
NEConcordIrrigated26924226561%36%2%R4, Dough
NEElginIrrigated26825227534%52%13%R4, Dough
NEHoldregeDryland1439012976%23%0%R4, Dough
NEHoldregeIrrigated25725627513%42%44%R4, Dough
NEMcCookDryland1184351100%0%0%R5, Dent
NEMcCookIrrigated23821322965%31%2%R4, Dough
NEMeadDryland2082002189%81%9%R4, Dough
NEMeadIrrigated24721322684%15%0%R4, Dough
NENorth PlatteDryland1308412170%29%0%R4, Dough
NENorth PlatteIrrigated25624327222%47%29%R4, Dough
NEO'NeillIrrigated2472432707%51%41%R4, Dough
IAAmesDryland2492402625%81%13%R4, Dough
IACrawfordsvilleDryland2382332575%77%16%R4, Dough
IAKanawhaDryland2552432613%96%0%R4, Dough
IALewisDryland22318321857%42%0%R4, Dough
IANashuaDryland25724325910%83%5%R4, Dough
IASutherlandDryland24522223921%75%2%R4, Dough
ILBondvilleDryland2512572770%64%35%R4, Dough
ILFreeportDryland24222725416%69%13%R4, Dough
ILOlneyDryland2111952035%94%0%R5, Dent
ILPeoriaDryland2292432670%42%57%R4, Dough
ILSpringfieldDryland2182402510%38%61%R4, Dough
INButlervilleDryland2372502650%52%47%R4, Dough
INColumbia CityDryland2502542874%52%43%R2, Blister
INDavisDryland2582662780%86%13%R3, Milk
INWest LafayetteDryland2552793010%30%69%R4, Dough
KSGarden CityIrrigated23620722082%17%0%R5, Dent
KSHutchinsonDryland1171191220%100%0%R5, Dent
KSManhattanDryland1591721780%63%36%R5, Dent
KSScandiaDryland1571781890%15%85%R4, Dough
KSScandiaIrrigated23421623435%62%2%R4, Dough
KSSilverlakeDryland1631701800%67%32%R5, Dent
KSSilverlakeIrrigated21821322615%72%12%R5, Dent
MICerescoDryland2332412730%60%40%R2, Blister
MIEast LansingDryland2372462640%66%33%R2, Blister
MIMungerDryland2472432680%76%23%R2, Blister
MNEldredDryland16611114580%20%0%R4, Dough
MNLambertonDryland2462572750%65%34%R4, Dough
MNWasecaDryland2472632920%43%56%R4, Dough
MOBrunswickDryland19517819823%73%3%R4, Dough
MOMonroe CityDryland1922102250%36%64%R4, Dough
MOSt. JosephDryland1902002110%73%26%R5, Dent
NDDazeyDryland16716420516%35%48%R3, Milk
OHCustarDryland2302222507%73%19%R3, Milk
OHSouth CharlestonDryland2342402590%72%27%R4, Dough
OHWoosterDryland2362362660%63%36%R2, Blister

§Long-term (last 20-plus years) potential yield at each location and surrounding area.

Range of forecasted 2026 potential yields based on average planting date in 2023, indicating the potential yields in the 25th and 75th percentile of the potential yield distribution (associated with respective adverse and favorable weather scenarios during the rest of the season).

Probability of obtaining a 2026 yield below, near, and above than the long-term potential yield at each location (±10% for rainfed sites; ±5% for irrigated sites)

Simulated Corn Stage Across 43 Locations

Corn has reached the dent stage in the southern fringe of the Corn Belt (Kansas, western Missouri, and southern Illinois). In the rest of the region, corn has reached the dough stage, except for a few sites in the northern and eastern regions (North Dakota, Michigan, and parts of Indiana and Ohio) where corn remains in the milk or even blister stage. In general, current corn development is similar to the 2025 crop season (Figure 2).

Map of simulated corn growth stages in Nebraska and Kansas, showing R4 and R5 stages in August.
Figure 2a. Simulated developmental stage for irrigated corn at each location. R1: silking; R2: blister; R3: milk; R4: dough; R5: dent. 
Map showing simulated rainfed corn growth stages across the Midwest, color-coded by R2-R5 stages.
Figure 2b. Simulated developmental stage for rainfed corn at each location. R1: silking; R2: blister; R3: milk; R4: dough; R5: dent. 

Irrigated Corn: Near- or Below-Average Yields

The range of forecasted irrigated corn yield potential for each location, as well as the probability for yields above, near, or below average, are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Due to above-average nighttime temperatures, above-average yields are unlikely, and five sites in Nebraska and Kansas already have a high probability of below-average yields. At the remaining sites, temperature during the rest of grain filling will determine whether yields finish near or below average. Overall, the outlook for irrigated corn in Kansas and Nebraska is more pessimistic than last year's and similar to that in prior years with high nighttime temperatures like 2023.

Variation in Forecasted 2026 Rainfed Corn Yields

Forecasted yield potential is variable across rainfed sites (Figures 3 and 4). Despite generally below-average rainfall during the past three weeks, the probability of near-average yields is high in the central and eastern regions (most of Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio) and at a few scattered sites in Nebraska and Kansas. Favorable water balances during June and early July are likely to have reduced the effects of temporary water shortages in late July. Indeed, there is a high probability of near-average yields (greater than 75%) at 13 sites across the Corn Belt. 

The probability of below-average yields increases toward the western Corn Belt (southwest Iowa, southeast and western Nebraska, and northern Michigan), where four sites show a high probability of below-average yields (greater than 75%). 

The probability of above-average yields is low across most of the Corn Belt, except for one site in northern Kansas and a few scattered sites in the eastern states.

Compared with the previous forecast, below-average rainfall across the central and western Corn Belt during the past three weeks reduced the probability of above-average yields, except at sites in northeastern Kansas. In contrast, the outlook remained similar for the eastern sites. Conditions at eastern sites changed little. Compared with 2025, the current outlook remains similar across the central and eastern Corn Belt but more pessimistic to the west.

Forecasted irrigated yields graph with data points, vertical bars, and regions KS and NE marked.
Figure 3a. Vertical lines indicate the range of forecasted 2026 irrigated corn yield potential by Aug. 4 based on average planting date in 2026 at each location. Horizontal lines indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles of the yield distribution (associated with respective adverse and favorable weather scenarios during the rest of the season). The blue squares indicate the long-term (2005-2025) average yield potential at each location. 
Range of forecasted rainfed yields by Aug 4, chart with blue dots and error bars for multiple states.
Figure 3b. Vertical lines indicate the range of forecasted 2026 rainfed corn yield potential by Aug. 4 based on average planting date in 2026 at each location. Horizontal lines indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles of the yield distribution (associated with respective adverse and favorable weather scenarios during the rest of the season). The blue squares indicate the long-term (2005-2025) average yield potential at each location. 
Map of Nebraska with pie charts showing irrigated corn yield probabilities by location.
Figure 4a. Probability of the 2026 irrigated corn yield potential to be below (at least 5%, red color), near (±5%, yellow color), and above (above 5%, green color) the long-term (2005-2025) average yield potential at each location. The larger a color section is within the pie chart, the higher the probability that end-of-season corn yield will be in that category.
Map showing corn yield probabilities across Midwest regions with pie charts indicating deviation levels.
Figure 4b. Probability of the 2026 rainfed corn yield potential to be below (at least 10% below, red color), near (±10%, yellow color), and above (at least 10% above, green color) the long-term (2005-2025) average yield potential at each location. The larger a color section is within the pie chart, the higher the probability that end-of-season corn yield will be in that category.

Conclusions

Near- or below-average irrigated yields are expected because of nighttime temperatures during flowering and early grain filling. 

Rainfed yields are expected to be near average for the eastern and central Corn Belt, but below average for most of the western region. 

Temperature and rainfall during the rest of the grain filling will define the trend for the rainfed sites across the region. These forecasts do not account for problems with stand emergence, hail/flooding damage, replanting situations, disease or nitrate leaching. In fields negatively affected by these constraints, actual yields will be lower than estimates provided here. 

It is important to keep in mind that yield forecasts are not field specific. Instead, represent an estimate of average on-farm yield for a given location and the surrounding area, assuming none of the yield-reducing factors listed above are present. Likewise, crop stages and forecasted yields will deviate from the ones reported here in fields with planting dates or hybrid maturities that differ markedly from those used as the basis for the forecasts

Updated forecasts will be released in late August.

Explore our full collection of CropWatch articles.

Explore Articles