Aug. 4, 2011
Drops at Clay Center and Mead Likely due to Continued Nighttime Highs
Projections of yield potential for irrigated corn at two sites in central and eastern Nebraska dropped below long-term averages this week, according to a model developed by UNL researchers.
Growers may want to be checking their corn fields more closely, assessing ears and, if necessary, re-estimating potential yields and market options, suggest two UNL extension educators, based on output from the model.
The trend toward average or below average yields in irrigated corn was identified for fields being modeled in Clay and Saunders counties using UNL’s Hybrid-Maize decision-management tool.
Patricio Grassini, research assistant professor in UNL’s Department of Agronomy of Horticulture, has released yield forecasts for Holdrege, Clay Center, Mead, and Concord in Nebraska; Brookings, South Dakota; and Sutherland, Gilbert, and Nashua in Iowa, based on outputs from the Hybrid-Maize model. The model used actual weather data up to Monday, August 1, and then finished the season using data based on long-term averages for each site.
Forecast yields at Holdrege for irrigated corn were near or slightly above average for all planting dates. Forecast yields at Concord for rainfed corn were generally above average.
In general, forecast simulations performed for irrigated corn dropped below the long-term average for most planting dates for Clay and Saunders counties. Forecast water-limited yield potential for rainfed corn changed little from the previous week’s projections and is still above the long-term average, except at Clay Center (Table 1). In fact, at Mead rainfed yields are projected to exceed the 30-year average by 20 bu/ac. (View Grassini and Cassman's data for these sites to see how projections changed from the July 17 to the July 24 and August 1 reports.)
“I believe the reason for the sharp drop-off is due to high night temperatures, which have been well above normal,” said Ken Cassmann, UNL Heuermann professor of agronomy and horticulture, who helped develop Hybrid-Maize. “These shorten the growing season due to accelerated development rate and result in greater losses due to respiration.”
The Hybrid-Maize tool simulates the growth of field corn under irrigated or rainfed conditions based on daily weather data, planting date, hybrid, maturity, soil type, and other factors.
The model does not simulate the specific effects of high temperatures on pollination and seed abortion, Cassman said. If these kinds of problems are occurring, the Hybrid-Maize projection will overestimate yield.
Field Observations Support Projections
The crop may look good from the road, but if growers want to verify their yield projections, they should be checking plants throughout the field to look for signs of pollination or other problems that could impact yield, advises Jenny Rees, extension educator in Clay County.
In a number of fields that Rees surveyed Monday, she found ears with blank kernels or with yellow silks intermingled with brown ones that never pollinated. Some ears had large gaps. (Rees writes about predicted corn yields in her August 1 blog post at http://jenreesources.wordpress.com/2011/08/01/predicted-2011-corn-yields/.)
Also see
How Extended High Heat Disrupts Corn Pollination
Tom Dorn, extension educator in Lancaster County, and Keith Glewen, extension educator in Saunders County, report similar problems in their counties in east central Nebraska. (See corn photos from Dorn in Field Updates.)
Consultants and growers have reported a lot of ears with 14 rows rather than the typical 16 or 18 rows, Glewen said. The pollination problems aren’t specific to hybrid or planting date and seem to be more common in southern Saunders County, Glewen said.
Rees and Glewen both point out that some of the ear and yield problems becoming evident now likely date back to earlier in the season.
Many corn growing areas saw harsh conditions that were not very favorable for corn early on in the growing season, when ear size is determined, Glewen said. Some areas had excessive rains and roots had ample water at the surface, but with reduced rains later in the season, plants were stressed as roots were forced to seek water deeper.
“I’ve seen some areas, particularly in northeast Nebraska, that look like they’ll be producing tremendous yields. Yields in other areas are suspect and may be at or below the long-term average this year,” Glewen said.
Lisa Jasa
CropWatch Editor
Table 1. Hybrid-Maize yield projections for corn yields in three Nebraska counties and three planting dates. (Source: Grassini and Cassman presentation) |
||||
Sites and Planting Dates | Long-term Average Yield Potential (Planting Date) |
2011 Forecasted Yield Potential (Median) | ||
Clay Center, Irrigated | 250 (April 27) | July 17 | July 24 | Aug. 1 |
April 23 | 250 | 242 | 239 | |
April 30 | 250 | 246 | 241 | |
May 7 | 252 | 249 | 244 | |
Clay Center, Rainfed | 145 (April 23) | |||
April 23 | 134 | 142 | 132 | |
April 30 | 139 | 145 | 136 | |
May 7 | 139 | 148 | 145 | |
Mead, Irrigated | 241 (April 30) | |||
April 30 | 236 | 228 | 223 | |
May 7 | 238 | 230 | 223 | |
May 14 | 241 | 234 | 230 | |
Mead, Rainfed | 153 (April 30) | |||
April 30 | 175 | 171 | 174 | |
May 7 | 179 | 171 | 174 | |
May 14 | 185 | 182 | 196 | |
Holdrege, Irrigated | 247 (April 27) | |||
April 27 | 246 | 250 | 246 | |
May 4 | 246 | 250 | 249 | |
May 11 | 255 | 257 | 255 |