August 21, 2009
The attainable wheat yield in a particular season is mainly determined by the
- wheat variety,
- management input, and
- growing conditions Mother Nature provides.
Of these three factors, producers can exercise the maximum leverage for the minimum cost through variety selection. Variety selection can mean the difference between a most rewarding season or a disappointing one. Varieties selected to meet the needs of your operation are likely to generate the most return for comparatively less investment than other varieties. The UNL Variety Testing Program provides useful information on winter wheat varieties sold in Nebraska based on field trials conducted throughout the state under various conditions. Wheat varieties tested by the program come from
- the UNL wheat breeding program,
- public breeding programs from surrounding states such as Colorado, Kansas, and South Dakota, and
- the private seed industry.
The Nebraska Wheat Board financially supports the testing of wheat varieties from other public institutions.
Accessing Wheat Variety Test Results
The results of these wheat variety tests are made available through the UNL Variety Test Web site and the Fall Seed Guide, Extension publication EC 101. (The publication is available from your local Extension office.) The Fall Seed Guide also contains information from the Nebraska Crop Improvement Association on certified seed sources and private industries developing and marketing wheat seeds in Nebraska.
This information is a good tool to help you make informed decisions when selecting varieties to plant for next year’s crop. It includes variety test results for yield, seed size, test weight, and grain protein at locations tested. Other important characteristics included are relative values for maturity, winter hardiness, straw strength, coleoptiles length, and disease and insect resistance.
Table 1 shows where trials were conducted this season and the yield potential and the mean yield of the top five and top ten varieties tested at each location. This information can help you get a glance of how various varieties performed at a location of interest. If the yield reported for the top five or ten doesn’t significantly differ from the current variety (ies) you use, it may not be necessary to look further. This is if yield is the only criteria. Use the LSD (Least Significant Difference) value to evaluate whether the observed difference in performance between varieties is significant. A 5% LSD value indicates a variety would yield better than the other variety at least 95 of 100 times due to real difference.
Table 2 shows the name and yield of the top five varieties for all locations by region. Some varieties were good across location and regions. Some performed well under regular and organic field management conditions. Varieties that ranked in the top five most frequently are shown in Table 3. When everything else remained the same, varieties that maintained reasonably high yield across locations and under different management conditions may show additional quality for stable yield performance.
Tips for Selecting Wheat Varieties Suited to Your Operation
Management information for all testing sites is given in the Fall Seed Guide (EC101). Producers are encouraged to relate the information given for the sites they’re interested in and consider how varietal response might transfer to their farm condition and management.
One advantage with comparing wheat test data over some other crops is the ease of finding three- to five-year averages. Wheat varieties have a longer field life than other crops such as corn. It is appropriate also to look at variety performance at different variety trial locations even when the location characteristics are far removed. Typically we conduct more than 20 wheat variety trials across the state each year. These trials are tested under rainfed, irrigated, and organic conditions. This gives an additional option for evaluating how some cultivars respond to a change in management.
- Look at how a variety performed over several counties and several years. Information from one season to another and from one site to another varies with seasonal weather variation and associated effects on disease and pest dynamics. Comparing several sites and years can provide a more realistic average. Emphasize varieties that perform well over years and across locations. They’ll have more stability of performance and may do well under your specific conditions.
- Consider factors such as soil type, seasonal rainfall amount and distribution, temperature, and management factors such as plot history, crop rotation, previous crop, residue management, tillage etc. These will have a significant effect on varietal performance in terms of yield, grain quality, and disease reaction.
- Emphasize varieties that showed good disease and pest ratings at locations nearest to your farm or at locations with growing conditions similar to yours.
- Depending on your farm condition and management style, consider potential benefit from stalks and crop aftermath.
- Look for other agronomic characteristics that fit your management and production objective such as what you want to do with stables.
- Also consider secondary benefits such as feed value after the field is harvested.
Teshome Regassa
Extension Educator
Table 1. Location Summary for Nebraska Winter Wheat Variety Tests, 2009. |
||||||
|
|
Date |
Location Mean Yields (bu/a) |
|||
Region |
County |
Planted |
Harvested |
Top Yield |
Top 5 |
Top 10 |
Southeast |
Lancaster |
Oct. 02, 2008 |
July 7, 2009 |
72.8 |
68.7 |
65.4 |
|
Saunders |
Sept. 26, 2008 |
July 9, 2009 |
84.9 |
78.2 |
74.6 |
South Central |
Clay |
Sept. 19, 2008 |
July 8, 2009 |
66.0 |
62.6 |
61.2 |
South West |
Furnas |
Sept. 25, 2008 |
July 10, 2009 |
88.3 |
84.4 |
81.9 |
|
Keith |
Sept. 16, 2008 |
July 17, 2009 |
51.5 |
50.1 |
49.4 |
|
Lincoln |
Sept. 26, 2008 |
July 15, 2009 |
78.8 |
76.2 |
75.1 |
|
Red Willow |
Sept. 23, 2008 |
July 9, 2009 |
81.2 |
78.9 |
76.8 |
Panhandle |
Box Butte Rain-fed |
Sept. 16, 2008 |
July 22, 2009 |
96.0 |
91.3 |
88.8 |
|
Cheyenne Rain-fed |
Sept. 15, 2008 |
July 24, 2009 |
78.1 |
77.0 |
76.3 |
|
Deuel Rain-fed |
Sept. 16, 2008 |
July 22, 2009 |
77.4 |
76.0 |
74.9 |
|
Morrill Rain-fed |
Sept. 11, 2008 |
July 18, 2009 |
44.5 |
41.3 |
39.9 |
|
Scotts Bluff Rain-fed |
Sept. 15, 2008 |
July 18, 2009 |
40.5 |
38.2 |
37.2 |
Southwest Irrigated |
Chase |
Oct. 3, 2008 |
July 22, 2009 |
78.5 |
80.1 |
77.7 |
Northeast Irrigated |
Holt |
Sept. 19, 2008 |
July 23, 2009 |
86.7 |
83.5 |
81.0 |
Organic |
Cheyenne Organic |
Sept. 19, 2008 |
July 24, 2009 |
44.0 |
42.3 |
41.7 |
|
Saunders organic |
Oct. 9, 2008 |
July 15,2009 |
94.4 |
89.4 |
87.4 |
|
Clay Organic |
Oct. 10, 2008 |
July 9, 2009 |
66.2 |
64.5 |
62.6 |
|
Dixon organic |
Oct. 3, 2008 |
July 10, 2009 |
53.5 |
53.5 |
51.4 |
Table 2. Top Five High Yielding Varieties by County and Region |
||||||||||
|
Deuel |
bu/a |
Cheyenne |
bu/a |
Morrill |
bu/a |
Scotts Bluff |
bu/a |
Box Butte |
bu/a |
West Dryland |
NE03490 |
77 |
Keota |
78 |
Settler CL |
45 |
NE03490 |
41 |
NI04421 |
96 |
Alliance |
77 |
Settler CL |
77 |
NE03490 |
42 |
Settler CL |
38 |
Winterhawk |
95 |
|
Camelot |
75 |
NE03490 |
77 |
Harry |
41 |
Infinity CL |
37 |
Harry |
91 |
|
Harry |
75 |
NE05496 |
77 |
Goodstreak |
40 |
Winterhawk |
37 |
NE05549 |
88 |
|
Smoky Hill |
75 |
Harry |
77 |
Alliance |
40 |
NI04421 |
37 |
Settler CL |
87 |
|
|
Lincoln |
bu/a |
Keith |
bu/a |
Furnas |
bu/a |
Red Willow |
bu/a |
|
|
West Central |
Armour |
79 |
NE05496 |
52 |
NE01481 |
88 |
NE01481 |
81 |
|
|
Goodstreak |
76 |
NuDakota(W) |
50 |
NE04490 |
85 |
NE05496 |
80 |
|
|
|
Art |
76 |
Alliance |
50 |
Camelot |
84 |
NE03490 |
79 |
|
|
|
Camelot |
75 |
NI04421 |
50 |
NX04Y2107 |
83 |
Alliance |
79 |
|
|
|
Alliance |
75 |
Aspen (W) |
50 |
Millennium |
82 |
NE05549 |
76 |
|
|
|
|
Lancaster |
bu/a |
Saunders |
bu/a |
|
Clay |
bu/a |
|
|
|
Southeast |
Overland |
73 |
Hallam |
85 |
|
South Central |
Wesley |
66 |
|
|
Millennium |
72 |
Hitch |
79 |
|
NX04Y2107 |
63 |
|
|
||
Hitch |
67 |
NE01481 |
79 |
|
NE05430 |
62 |
|
|
||
Wahoo |
67 |
NE05403 |
74 |
|
NE04490 |
61 |
|
|
||
Infinity CL |
66 |
NE04490 |
74 |
|
Settler CL |
61 |
|
|
||
|
Holt |
bu/a |
Chase |
bu/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigated |
NI04420 |
87 |
Aspen (W) |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PostRock |
86 |
Armour |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NE05426 |
82 |
NE04490 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Art |
82 |
Settler CL |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NI04436 |
81 |
NE03490 |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 3. Most frequent high yielding wheat varieties by management |
|||||||||
Conventional |
Organic |
All Management |
|||||||
Freq. | Variety | Freq. | Variety | Freq. | Variety | Freq. | Variety | Freq. | Variety |
6 |
NE03490 |
2 |
Art |
4 |
NE03490 |
10 |
NE03490 |
2 |
Aspen (W) |
6 |
Settler CL |
2 |
Aspen (W) |
2 |
Camelot |
6 |
Settler CL |
2 |
Hatcher |
5 |
Alliance |
2 |
Goodstreak |
2 |
Hatcher |
5 |
Alliance |
2 |
Hitch |
4 |
Harry |
2 |
Hitch |
2 |
NE06469 |
5 |
Camelot |
2 |
Infinity CL |
4 |
NE04490 |
2 |
Infinity CL |
2 |
Pronghorn |
4 |
Harry |
2 |
Millennium |
3 |
Camelot |
2 |
Millennium |
2 |
Wahoo |
4 |
NE04490 |
2 |
NE05549 |
3 |
NE01481 |
2 |
NE05549 |
|
|
3 |
Goodstreak |
2 |
NE06469 |
3 |
NE05496 |
2 |
NX04Y2107 |
|
|
3 |
NE01481 |
2 |
NX04Y2107 |
3 |
NI04421 |
2 |
Winterhawk |
|
3 |
NE05496 |
2 |
Pronghorn |
|
2 |
Armour |
|
|
|
|
3 |
NI04421 |
2 |
Wesley |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Wahoo |
2 |
Winterhawk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Armour |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Art |
|
|