Farmer Testimonials: Nebraskans Share Real-World Results with Sentinel Ag

October 17, 2025

Farmer Testimonials: Nebraskans Share Real-World Results with Sentinel Ag

By Jason Richters - Nebraska farmer, Tyler Smith - Nebraska farmer, Scott Richert - Nebraska farmer, Todd Schmieding - Nebraska farmer, Jesse Williams - Nebraska farmer, Brad Morner - Nebraska farmer, Erik Friesen - Nebraska farmer, Jenny Brhel - Extension Educator

Four Nebraska farmers sit on a discussion panel, with one speaking and gesturing as others listen during a nitrogen management Q&A about Sentinel Ag.

After years of research and field validation, Nebraska growers are proving that sensor-based nitrogen management isn’t just a theory — it’s a practical way to cut costs, protect water quality, and maintain yields. Hear how several producers have adapted Sentinel Ag technology on their farms and what they’ve learned along the way.

The 2025 Nitrogen Challenge Farmer Panel: Jason Richters, Todd Schmieding, Erik Friesen, Tyler Smith. (Abigayle Warm| Nebraska Extension)

Nothing beats hearing how a practice works from farmers who’ve already put it to the test. 

To that end, we asked several Nebraska farmers who have tried Sentinel Ag in the Upper Big Blue and Little Blue NRDs to share their reasons for using this management platform, their experiences with it, and the advice they’d give to fellow growers looking to try it. The following individuals have used Sentinel Ag in-season nitrogen management for more than one year and were willing to share what they’ve learned — we appreciate their candid insights and their leadership in helping other growers consider this technology.

For more information on research-based results from using sensing technologies like Sentinel Ag, please see this week’s nitrogen management article in CropWatch

A group of six panelists sit at the front of a classroom answering questions from attendees during a nitrogen management discussion featuring Sentinel Ag users.
Nebraska Extension has hosted two Nitrogen Challenge Farmer Panels so far — one in 2024 and the other earlier this year. In this photo, the 2024 panel of Jason Richters, Scott Richert, Mike Spray, Tyler Smith, Phil Christenson and Jesse Williams share their insights on using the Sentinel Ag platform. (Jenny Brhel | Nebraska Extension) 

Jason Richters

I had a desire to improve my nitrogen use efficiency, so I decided to try the Sentinel Ag nitrogen management system three years ago. The ability to know if the crop needs a nitrogen application based on satellite imagery is a game changer, and we have learned that we can better manage and reduce our nitrogen application rates while maintaining yields. This is good for our bottom line and may eventually reduce nitrate levels in our groundwater.

Using a nitrogen management system is a management change, but more importantly, it’s been a management improvement. I encourage other farmers to try this technology, especially if they are already split applying their nitrogen.

Tyler Smith

My experience is a little different than most producers because I was able to be a part of the development of the concept that grew into Sentinel Ag with my role at UNL. As far as my personal farm operation, I had started fertigating about 15 years ago and had seen the benefits of spreading out my nitrogen applications, but there were years where I wondered if I needed that last fertigation. 

After Sentinel became commercially available, I could see the promise of the method and I enrolled a couple of fields in 2022 and 2023. I was realizing nitrogen savings without losing yield. In 2024 and 2025, I’ve had all of my irrigated corn acres enrolled and I’ve been able to lower my nitrogen use by 10-40% while achieving several new field best yields.

What I’ve observed is that nitrogen availability is so variable, in both total growing season need and the timing of that need, that I don’t know how I can ever hope to accurately predict it. It’s much easier to let the corn tell me when it needs it and, at the end of the season, I’ll know what the total need was, not at the beginning. We don’t decide how much irrigation we will need for the next growing season in November or March; it’s a real-time decision that we make as we go through growing season that accounts for changes in weather, yield potential, ROI, etc. We have the ability to manage nitrogen the same way that accounts for all of the unknowns in real-time with a sensor-based approach.

Scott Richert

I started my in-season nitrogen a while ago with the N-Sense program, using sensors on a Hagie sprayer. I had been sidedressing for years but wanted to see if I could get better. What I found was I was close. I was putting on enough to have a good yield, but the sensors had better ROI. From there, we kept adjusting, and when the Sentinel program came out, I put two fields in. 

I found the same thing — that I was getting a good yield, but the sensors were having a better ROI. So, ROI is great, but the other thing that means is that I was overapplying nitrogen. In the Upper Big Blue NRD, I live in one of the areas that has not moved up on the list for testing and reporting. Looking at how the numbers have been moving, though, it’s just a matter of time. 

For my soil, it takes 30 years for the nitrate to make it to the water table. It basically takes most of a farming career for the nitrogen you apply to make it to the aquifer. If we want to make things better for the people who come behind us, we need to make changes now.  

With in-season application, I have nitrogen in the system only when my crop is there and using it. I have the nitrogen that the crop needs now, not for the whole season. If we have adverse weather, I can adjust to that. If it is hailed out, I save the balance of my fertilizer and don’t let it leach away. If the plant is telling me it needs more, I can put it on. If the mineralization is really good, the plant will tell me it is happy and I can save an application.

There are some issues to work through. You don’t really know how much nitrogen you are going to use on each farm each year. You may need to purchase more later in the season, or you may need to store some until next year. Sometimes it has been hard to apply when you want. It can rain at an inopportune time, but I’ve never not gotten the application done. The sensors have a seven-day window of time to make an application.

Todd Schmieding

Sentinel has allowed me to manage nitrogen as it is needed on the field. It accounts for release from cover crops in a way that gives me the full credit when it is available. It does add challenges in timing and changing when my work occurs, as it is not predictable. I have also seen changes in status before I applied the nitrogen, creating additional questions as to what is happening in the field. 

If you’re considering adding this to your program, start on one field at first and then expand from there.

Jesse Williams

Using in-season nitrogen application through the pivot allows you to spread the applications out and “spoon-feed” the crop. Adding a sensor system such as Sentinel provides an additional tool to monitor crop needs. The big benefit to this, in my mind, is the ability to apply nitrogen based on crop needs and potential throughout the season. Applying a full rate upfront of 1-1.2lb per expected bushel can prove to be extremely wasteful if you encounter weather-related issues such as hail, heavy rainfall or wind damage. 

Using the spoon-feed approach with fertigation for the last three years, I have typically been able to keep my nitrogen use under 0.8lb per bushel.

Challenges for me have been gaps in imagery due to cloud cover/smoke. This year, I probably shot from the hip more on applications due to the fact that I was going a week or more between imagery updates and trying to time applications between rainfalls. 

I think Sentinel has some solutions to help with this, including capturing drone imagery and modeling expected uptake based on planting date, maturity and GDUs. We had thought linking my FieldView account would bring some of this information in, but FieldView seems to be struggling to link with any partners this year. 

Another challenge is working with applicators on variable rate nitrogen applications, since there seems to be very few farmers in the area doing variable rate nitrogen, so their experience in applying it is not where it should be. I have also struggled to get as-applied maps back from applicators after the application is done.

Brad Morner

This has been my third season using Sentinel, and my experience with in-season nitrogen has been good. I am glad I’ve tried it. It’s made me aware of how much less nitrogen I can use and still have good yields. 

Working with Sentinel has been a very good experience. They are so easy to work with and always get back to me quickly, when I have questions. I like it because Sentinel tells me when the corn needs more nitrogen based on the satellite sensing technology, so I’m not just guessing when to apply more. I realized that I could get by with less nitrogen and still get the same yields. 

The biggest challenge is that it takes a little more time during the season. I used to fertigate once during the season. With Sentinel, I do two or three smaller applications instead of one large application, but I also realize that it is worth the extra time because I am applying the nitrogen more efficiently as needed.

Erik Friesen

Yesterday we took out two National Corn Grower Association (NCGA) contest plots. Both were about 140 lb N, two different hybrids, and both did 295. These were also non-GMO white corn. This year, every acre we have has less than 150lb N. If people can update equipment, adapt to different tillage practices, use of autosteer and technology, why do people still use the same idea they did 40 years ago when it comes to fertilizer recommendations? The struggle I see is the time it takes — big farmers will just keep doing the same thing. But I guess this is what makes me more competitive with them: raising high value crops, using less inputs.

Nitrogen Challenge

Consider joining these and several other producers who have taken the Nitrogen Challenge in both irrigated and non-irrigated fields. In-season sensing technologies can be used for fertigation and/or side-dress nitrogen applications. 

  • For pre-plant applications, leave one piece of ground with a base rate of 50-100 lb N/ac.
  • Goal is to apply the rest of nitrogen in season using a tool like Sentinel Ag that senses what the plant needs.
  • Only asking producers to consider this for one field. Are you willing to join us in this?

Explore our full collection of CropWatch articles.

Explore Articles