2022 Corn Yield Forecasts as of Aug. 16

2022 Corn Yield Forecasts as of Aug. 16

This article summarizes the simulated crop stages and yield forecasts performed on Aug. 16 for 40 locations across the U.S. Corn Belt using the UNL Hybrid-Maize crop model; the data can be seen in Table 1. Details on the underpinning methodology to simulate phenology and forecast end-of-season yields, as well as on interpretation and uses of yield forecasts, are described in a previous article.

During the last two weeks, solar radiation was above the historical average in sites located in NE and KS while below average records were registered in IL and OH. The remaining sites presented near average values. Daily air temperature was well above average in NE, KS and IA, while nighttime temperature was near historical records in the entire Corn Belt. In the case of rainfall, most locations exhibited below-normal records, except for sites in MN and in the central and eastern part of the region (IN, IL, MI and OH) where precipitation was near or above normal. A summary of weather conditions during the last two weeks is shown in Figure 1.

Weather conditions summary chart
Figure 1. Daily solar radiation, maximum and minimum air temperature (Tmax and Tmin), total rainfall, and total reference grass-based evapotranspiration (ET) for the time period between Aug. 2 and Aug. 16, 2022. Vertical bars indicate the range for these variables based on 20-plus years of weather records. The horizontal thick line indicates the long-term average and the red dots indicate the 2022 values.

Table 1. Data from simulations of 2022 end-of-season corn yield potential and real-time crop stage performed on Aug. 16.
LocationWater regimeLong-term average yield (bu/ac) §Range of Yp forecasts as of Aug 16 (bu/ac)¶ 25thRange of Yp forecasts as of Aug 16 (bu/ac)¶ 75thProbability (%) of 2022 yield to be: Below (relative to the long-term Yp)†Probability (%) of 2022 yield to be: Near (relative to the long-term Yp)†Probability (%) of 2022 yield to be: Above (relative to the long-term Yp)†Simulated current crop stage*
NE Alliance Irrigated 193 177 194 12% 82% 6% R4, Dough
Beatrice Dryland 161 111 119 100% 0% 0% R5, Dent
Irrigated 230 196 205 84% 16% 0% R5, Dent
Clay Center Dryland 157 78 94 100% 0% 0% R4, Dough
Irrigated 245 225 241 20% 80% 0% R4, Dough
Concord Dryland 174 97 118 100% 0% 0% R4, Dough
Irrigated 249 229 253 12% 85% 2% R4, Dough
Elgin Irrigated 252 230 250 21% 74% 6% R4, Dough
Holdrege Dryland 113 88 105 68% 32% 0% R5, Dent
Irrigated 242 241 258 0% 88% 12% R4, Dough
McCook Dryland 88 35 35 100% 0% 0% R5, Dent
Irrigated 225 186 192 100% 0% 0% R5, Dent
Mead Dryland 182 122 143 98% 2% 0% R4, Dough
Irrigated 235 205 223 42% 58% 0% R5, Dent
North Platte Dryland 90 46 56 98% 2% 0% R4, Dough
Irrigated 234 220 241 8% 90% 2% R4, Dough
O'Neill Irrigated 227 207 226 24% 70% 5% R4, Dough
IA Ames Dryland 229 179 203 79% 21% 0% R4, Dough
Crawfordsville Dryland 230 136 153 100% 0% 0% R4, Dough
Lewis Dryland 209 138 158 96% 4% 0% R4, Dough
Nashua Dryland 228 230 252 3% 70% 27% R3, Milk
Sutherland Dryland 210 142 173 97% 3% 0% R4, Dough
IL Bondville Dryland 235 214 236 17% 80% 3% R4, Dough
Freeport Dryland 212 234 252 0% 25% 75% R4, Dough
Olney Dryland 190 204 212 0% 69% 31% R5, Dent
Peoria Dryland 211 219 236 0% 66% 34% R4, Dough
Springfield Dryland 179 225 234 0% 0% 100% R4, Dough
IN Butlerville Dryland 224 209 219 5% 95% 0% R4, Dough
Columbia City Dryland 224 231 243 0% 79% 21% R4, Dough
Davis Dryland 231 219 236 0% 100% 0% R4, Dough
West Lafayette Dryland 238 202 221 47% 53% 0% R4, Dough
KS Garden City Irrigated 218 178 180 100% 0% 0% R5, Dent
Hutchinson Dryland 100 Black layer on Aug. 2. Final yield: 61 bu/ac Matured
Manhattan Dryland 136 Black layer on Aug. 13. Final yield: 156 bu/ac Matured
Scandia Dryland 131 62 86 100% 0% 0% R4, Dough
Irrigated 226 231 249 0% 69% 31% R4, Dough
Silverlake Dryland 141 145 147 0% 100% 0% R5, Dent
Irrigated 209 213 218 0% 100% 0% R5, Dent
MI Ceresco Dryland 180 196 221 0% 33% 67% R2, Blister
MN Eldred Dryland 115 101 139 38% 23% 38% R3, Milk
Lamberton Dryland 212 201 223 16% 84% 0% R4, Dough
Waseca Dryland 219 236 265 0% 38% 62% R3, Milk
MO Brunswick Dryland 181 136 177 50% 50% 0% R4, Dough
Monroe City Dryland 174 198 215 0% 10% 90% R4, Dough
St. Joseph Dryland 167 187 212 0% 18% 82% R4, Dough
ND Dazey Dryland 109 90 132 41% 22% 37% R3, Milk
OH Custar Dryland 208 214 235 3% 59% 38% R3, Milk
South Charleston Dryland 216 220 244 0% 66% 34% R4, Dough
Wooster Dryland 210 210 237 3% 59% 38% R2, Blister

§Long-term (last 20-plus years) potential yield at each location and surrounding area.
¶ Range of forecasted 2022 potential yields based on average planting date in 2022, indicating the potential yields in the 25th and 75th percentile of the potential yield distribution (associated with respective adverse and favorable weather scenarios during the rest of the season).
† Probability of obtaining a 2022 yield below (<-10%), near (±10%), and above (>10%) than the long-term potential yield at each location.

Simulated Corn Stage Across 40 Locations

Corn has reached dough stage in a majority of sites, except for those in the northern and eastern fringes of the region. Due to high temperatures, corn has even reached kernel dent stage in the southern fringe of the Corn Belt (KS and southern NE and IL) and black layer at two sites in KS (Figure 2). Locations in the north and eastern fringes of the Corn Belt are behind last year’s corn development due to late planting (see forecasts for Aug. 4, 2021 and Aug. 25, 2021).

Figure 2. Simulated developmental stage for irrigated and rainfed corn at each location. R2: blister; R3: milk; R4: dough; R5: dent; physiological maturity: Matured. Separate maps are shown for irrigated corn (top) and rainfed corn (bottom).

Irrigated Corn: Near or Below-average Yields are Expected

The range of forecasted irrigated corn yield potential for each location, as well as the probabilities for yields above, near, or below average, are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Most irrigated sites (seven out of 13) exhibit a high probability (>75%, that is, three out of four chances) of near-average yield potential. Three sites located in southern NE and southwestern KS exhibit a high probability of below-average yield potential. Overall, the forecasted scenario for irrigated maize yield potential in the current season seems similar to the 2021 forecasted yield but 5% lower than the long-term average.

Rainfed Corn: Yield Potential is Highly Variable Across Rainfed Sites

Compared with our previous forecast, below-average rainfall during the past two weeks in most sites in NE, KS and IA increased the probability (>75%, that is, three out of four chances) of below-average yield potential in those states. Overall, 11 sites distributed in NE, KS, and south and west of IA have a high probability of below average yields. In contrast, a high probability of above average yield potential is expected in five scattered sites in the southern fringe of the Corn Belt (KS, MO and southern IL) and north of IL (Figures 3 and 4) because of sufficient rainfall and near-normal temperature. Probability of near-average yield is high at six sites mostly located in the eastern part of the Corn Belt (IN and IL). Overall, the forecasted regional average yield for rainfed maize in 2022 seems similar to that forecasted in 2021 but 7% lower than the long-term average.

Figure 3. Vertical lines indicate the range of forecasted 2022 corn yield potential by Aug. 16 based on average 2022 planting date at each location. Horizontal lines indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles of the yield distribution (associated with respective adverse and favorable weather scenarios during the rest of the season). The blue squares indicate the long-term (2005-2021) average yield potential at each location and the red dots represent the forecasted 2022 corn yield potential at sites that have already reached maturity. Separate charts are shown for irrigated corn (top) and rainfed corn (bottom).
Figure 4. Probability of the 2022 yield potential to be below (<10%, red color), near (± 10%, yellow color), and above (>10%, green color) the long-term (2005-2021) average yield potential at each location. Separate maps are shown for irrigated corn (top) and rainfed corn (bottom). The larger a color section is within the pie chart, the higher the probability that end-of-season corn yield will be in that category.

Conclusions

Corn has already reached the dough stage in most parts of the Corn Belt, while dent stage (or even black-layer) has been reached in a few sites in the southern fringe of the region. Compared to our previous forecasts, there is a higher probability of below-average yields for both irrigated and rainfed corn, especially in the western fringe in the region. Overall, the regional average yield is expected to be 5% (irrigated corn) and 7% (rainfed corn) below the historical averages, which differs from USDA yield forecasts that predict 2022 corn yield to be similar to the average during the 2015-2021 period.

These forecasts do not take into consideration problems with stand emergence, hail/flooding damage, replanting situations, disease or nitrate leaching. In fields negatively affected by these constraints, actual yields will be lower than estimates provided here. It is important to keep in mind that yield forecasts are not field specific and, instead, represent an estimate of average on-farm yield for a given location and surrounding area in absence of the yield-reducing factors mentioned here. Likewise, crop stages and forecasted yields will deviate from those reported here in fields with planting dates or hybrid maturities that differ markedly from those used as the basis for these forecasts. We will follow up with the final forecasted yield and analysis of the 2022 crop season in September.

Online Master of Science in Agronomy

With a focus on industry applications and research, the online program is designed with maximum flexibility for today's working professionals.

A field of corn.