Using Manure as an Aid in Reducing Erosion and Runoff

Ephermeral gully in a corn field.
Field 1. Research indicates that when used in combination with other measures, manure can play a valuable role in increasing soil aggregate size and reducing soil erosion such as from the ephermeral gully in this corn field.

Using Manure as an Aid in Reducing Erosion and Runoff August 3, 2017

Manure’s impact on formation of larger and more stable soil aggregates was the focus of an earlier article. This article reviews the soil erosion and runoff benefits resulting from changes to soil’s physical characteristics from manure.

Charles Wortmann and Dan Walters, faculty in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, provide several important insights in a field research initiative that monitored soil erosion, runoff, and phosphorus (P) loss from replicated field plots over three cropping seasons immediately after manure application and four subsequent years when no manure was applied. This article reviews results published in a Journal of Environmental Quality article, Phosphorus Runoff During Four Years Following Composted Manure Applications, and related information.

Chart indicating extended benefits of manure applied to crop fields.

Figure 2. Application of beef manure produced runoff and erosion benefits during the cropping seasons immediately following manure application (green bars) and for three additional crop years (blue bars) after the last manure application. (Reference: Heartland publication RP187, Agricultural Phosphorus Management and Water Quality in the Midwest.

Take Home Message

This research demonstrates that manure has significant value for reducing runoff and erosion. By itself, it can't solve the soil erosion shown in Figure 1, but when used in combination with other soil management practices, manure can protect our soils and limit agriculture’s environmental costs. In some instances, however, manure can be an environmental negative if phosphorus is allowed to accumulate in soils. To achieve the environmental benefits of manure and minimize the risks, manure application rates and frequency of re-application to the same field must maintain soil P levels near the agronomic levels required by the selected crops.

Wortmann and Walters’s primary intent was to understand P losses from manure application; however, they also observed several important impacts on soil physical and chemical characteristics. A low and high P composted beef manure was applied to replicated runoff plots (measuring 12 by 36 feet) with a median slope of 5.5% and soil series of Pohocco silt loam. Manure was applied to meet crop nitrogen requirements for three years in a row. Runoff plots were evaluated for these three cropping seasons immediately following manure application as well as three additional cropping seasons with no manure application. All erosion, runoff, and P loss resulting from natural rainfall and pivot irrigation was quantified from March through August of each of the six cropping seasons.

Lesson 1: Compost application reduced erosion…

and runoff by approximately two-thirds during the three cropping seasons following manure application (green bars in Figure 2). Improvements in soil water holding capacity and soil infiltration rates (see related article) were responsible for the lower runoff and erosion levels. One would expect less total sediment, nitrogen, and pesticide levels reaching nearby surface water based on these results. However, increased P levels in neighboring surface waters is an expected negative environmental impact (see Lesson 4 below).

Lesson 2: Manure application had a residual benefit…

for runoff and erosion that persisted for at least the next three cropping seasons (blue bars in Figure 2). This research observed approximate reductions in runoff of 40% and of erosion, 55%. The reduced runoff also suggest additional soil moisture storage and greater crop resiliency to dry periods.

Lesson 3: Additional soil quality benefits…

were observed for soil bulk density, soil organic matter, and pH (Table 1). Although visual evidence of compost disappeared within one year, soil organic matter content and pH benefits of manure were observed four years after the last manure application.

Table 1. Four years after the final compost application (spring 2000), soil bulk density, organic matter, and pH benefits continued to be observed.
TreatmentBulk Density (lb/SQ ft)Soil Organic Matter (%)Soil pH
0- to 2-inch Soil Sample
   Compost 65 to 66 5.2 to 5.8 7.4
   No Compost 70 3.9 5.8
2- to 4-inch Soil Sample
   Compost 76 3.5 6.9 to 7.0
   No Compost 77 3 5.5

Lesson 4: Increased soil P levels…

were significant as a result of three consecutive years of compost manure application and producing increased P movement in runoff and erosion. Application to meet crop N requirements applies more P than is required for crop production. Repeating this practice three years in a row, in addition to applying a high P compost (manure from cattle fed diet with distillers grains), further aggravates this negative environmental impact. If manure is to be applied at a nitrogen-based rate, it is desirable both economically and environmentally to not reapply manure to the same field until soil P levels return to a level requiring additional P supplementation. For some manures with a low N to P ratio, it may be desirable to apply manure at a rate equal to the P removed by the next three to five cropping seasons and then supplement with commercial nitrogen fertilizer to meet crop N requirements. This strategy will produce economic and environmental value, while minimizing the P impact on local surface water.


Manure’s economic and soil improvement benefits should both be recognized and built into successful cropping systems. Thanks to the work of Wortmann and Walters, we have better insights as to how manure can improve the physical characteristics of soils thus reducing runoff and erosion.

Funding support is from North Central Region Water Network. More information on manure and soil health, including past blog articles is at

Reviewers: Charles Shapiro, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Gary Lesoing, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; John Gilley, USDA Agricultural Research Service