University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources


April 21, 2006

Research review

Residue reduces soil moisture evaporation

Table 1. Growing season evaporation from irrigated soil surface.
Year
No Crop Canopy
Beneath Crop Canopy
 
Bare Soil
Straw Covered
Bare Soil
Straw Covered
Evaporation, inches/season

1986
15.1
8.5
7.6
3.8
1987
14.6
9.4
8.5
5.7

Center pivot irrigation systems typically wet the soil surface 15 to 20 times during the irrigation season. Each wetting cycle produces evaporation directly back into the atmosphere, depending on the amount of energy reaching the soil surface. Even with developed crop canopies, energy-limited evaporation can be a substantial portion of evapotranspiration (ET), about 30% of the ET during the irrigation season for fully irrigated corn grown in sandy soils.

Crop residues on the surface have a role in reducing evaporation from soils. UNL research at North Platte demonstrated that the equivalent of 6000 lb/ac of wheat stubble laying flat could reduce bare soil evaporation by half under a fully irrigated corn crop. This crop received only nine irrigation events during the growing season each year. The projected full season evaporation (120 days) is shown in Table 1.

Table 2. Soil water evaporation from various surface and canopy conditions.
Year - Crop
E Rate, in/day
E Rate, in/day
Cover
(Full ET irrigation)
(Reduced irrigation)

2003 Soybean
Bare soil
0.06
-
Corn residue
0.03
-
Wheat stubble
0.03
-
2004 Soybean
Bare soil
0.08
0.06
Corn residue
0.03
0.04
Wheat stubble
0.04
0.03
2004 Corn
Bare soil
0.06
0.05
Corn residue
0.03
0.03
Wheat stubble
0.03
0.02
2005 Corn*
Bare soil
0.07
0.07
Corn residue
0.04
0.04
Wheat stubble
0.04
0.05

*A July 4 hailstorm reduced the 2005 crop canopy, possibly increasing evaporation

Evaporation in the fully irrigated trial was reduced by 6.8 inches due to the crop canopy and another 3.8 inches due to the straw mulch. This savings of almost 4 inches of water in evaporation due to the crop residue is important, but represents only part of the story. This savings was measured during 120 days of the growing season. Additional benefits of crop residue extend throughout the year and include runoff control and soil moisture capture and snow capture. These other benefits could easily add 2 inches or more soil moisture to irrigation programs, as has been shown in dryland systems with residue management.

More recent KSU irrigation research at Garden City, Kansas, showed that corn and wheat residues reduced evaporation by 50%, or about 0.03 to 0.05 inches per day (Table 2). This quantity is impressive on a daily basis because extrapolated over 100 days of a growing season, the water savings totals 3 to 5 inches. Reducing soil water evaporation with the adoption of crop residue management can lead to reduced pumping and energy costs for irrigators with adequate water and increased crop production for irrigators with limited water supplies.

Norman Klocke
Former UNL Extension Irrigation Specialist
Professor in Water Resources Engineering
Kansas State University


You've got mail!
To receive Email notification when the latest Crop Watch is posted to the Web, use this form.

Copyright 2006 by the University of Nebraska Board of Regents. All rights reserved.
Published by University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperating with the counties and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln does not discriminate on the basis of gender, age, disability, race, color, religion, marital status, veteran's status, national or ethnic origin, or sexual orientation.