University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources


March 10, 2006

Seed treatments and alternatives for insect control in corn, soybeans, and sorghum.

There are now many more planting time options available to growers to choose from to manage seedling attacking insects and corn rootworms in corn. In soybeans, recent registration of seed treatments has given growers another alternative to control early season pests.

Seed treatments have become a common pest management tool for corn, soybean, and sorghum.
(Photo by Brett Hampton)

In the last few years, a couple changes have occurred in the fight against seedling- attacking insects. Several liquid insecticides were labeled for use in corn and advances in seed coating technology have allowed insecticides and fungicides to be applied to the seed on both corn and soybean, enabling farmers to buy pre-treated seed that is ready to plant.

Seed-applied insecticides

While seed coating advancements have led to increased protection from more pests, the costs of these pre-treated products are higher than the traditional hopper-box treatments. There are some advantages to using seed-applied insecticides, including:

As with many products, there also are disadvantages or misconceptions that should be considered, including the following for seed treatments:

Before buying a new product, carefully consider exactly what it is designed to do and how that fits in with your cropping plans.

Corn seed treatments

The newer seed-applied insecticides attempt to go beyond the traditional early season protection role. Not only do they protect against early season insects such as wireworms and seedcorn maggots, some are labeled for use against flea beetles, black cutworms and corn rootworms. Some are combinations of insecticides and fungicides and so also protect against disease.

Treated corn seed.
(Photo by Brett Hampton)

Two newer products, Cruiser and Poncho, have combined to gather a large portion of the market for seed treatments in corn. They are both neonicotinoids and are applied directly to the seed by commercial seed treaters. These products work on the insects’ central nervous system by binding nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. They are effective as contact insecticides and are systemically active. The rates of each product will vary depending on the target insects.

Product costs range from $3 to $5 an acre for seedling insect control and from $15 to $18 an acre for corn rootworm control. Costs could be lower if purchased as a “package” with seed and herbicide products. This compares with the cost of a planter box treatment in the range of $1.50 to $2.00 per acre, or a one-half rate of soil insecticide at $5 to $8 per acre.

Cruiser (thiamethoxam), a Syngenta product, is registered for field, pop, seed, and sweet corn, and soybeans, along with wheat, barley, sorghum, sugar beets, cotton, oilseed rape, and canola. The seedling insect rate on corn is 0.125 mg active ingredient per kernel. The corn rootworm (the label says light to moderate infestation) is 1.125 mg ai/kernel. Cruiser is often sold as “Cruiser Extreme Pak” which is a combination of Cruiser and fungicides Dynasty, Maxim XL, and Apron XL.

Poncho (clothianidin) is a Gustafson/Bayer product. It was first labeled in June 2003 and was widely used in 2004 and 2005. It replaced Gaucho and Prescribe (both imidacloprid products) in corn. Gustafson considers it more active systemically and more toxic to insects than imidacloprid. The two common use rates for Poncho are 0.25 mg ai/kernel (Poncho 250) for seedling insects and 1.25 mg ai/kernel (Poncho 1250) for corn rootworms.

Planter concerns

Seeds treated at high rates with Cruiser and Poncho are visibly thicker due to the amount of active ingredient applied to the seed. While few growers using these seeds have reported any planter problems, it is important for growers to calibrate planters to ensure the proper seeding rate. Also, it is a good idea to use talc or another seed flow enhancer as recommended by the planter equipment manufacturers.

Alternatives to seed-applied treatments

Corn planted in April, when soil temperatures are below 60 degrees, should be protected from seedling attacking insects. For seedling insects, planter box treatments with imidacloprid and bifenthrin as active ingredients work well and are cheaper than seed- applied products, however, they require more labor and there are exposure concerns because of the fine dust associated with application. These products are available at almost all farm chemical dealers.

Many growers apply liquid insecticides in-furrow with or without starter fertilizer. These products include: Warrior, Pounce, Regent, Baythroid and Capture. Generic Warrior (lambda-cyhalothrin), Pounce (permethrin), and Capture (bifenthrin) are now available. Granular insecticides at one-half rates also are an option. Product prices will be comparable to seed-applied treatments, depending on the rate used.

For corn rootworms in Nebraska, crop rotation is still the best overall alternative. In continuous corn, granular insecticides still provide the best root protection, along with liquids such as Capture and Regent. Adult control to prevent egg laying is still feasible in some areas of Nebraska. Transgenic corn provides excellent control of corn rootworms in most instances.

Recommendations

Cruiser and Poncho both give excellent control of seedling attacking insects such as wireworms and seed corn maggots. Although black cutworms are suppressed or controlled, either product (along with others) may be overwhelmed by large numbers of cutworms. Dingy, darksided, or other cutworms that overwinter as partially grown larvae cause most cutworm problems in Nebraska. This may affect control, and there is little data about controlling these species. Fields treated with Cruiser and Poncho should still be scouted for cutworm problems and rescued if necessary.

Corn rootworm control with these seed treatments has been erratic in various university trials. Often these seed treatments will not prevent root damage to the same extent that soil insecticides do; however, yield results appear to be favorable, indicating that the corn plants may be recovering better than expected considering the root damage sustained. More yield trials are needed to establish a definite relationship between seed treatments and other corn rootworm control options. Caution should be used when choosing these products as a primary rootworm control. Ideally, they should be used in fields with low to moderate pressure, although it is difficult to determine which continuous corn fields would fall into those categories, unless the field was scouted for rootworm adults on a regular basis the previous summer.

Economics

Soil insecticides at full rates will cost $11-15 an acre (based on prices found on the Internet as of 2/20/2006). Reduced rates for seedling insect control depend on the rate selected by the grower. Generic permethrin costs approximately $0.50 an ounce. Warrior and Capture cost about $1.75 an ounce. Baythroid costs about $2.00 an ounce. Check with your local dealers or Internet vendors for the latest prices.

Growers should carefully assess the risk and reward of using any insecticide treatment. Seed attacking insects such as wireworms are very sporadic and normally do not affect a large number of acres. Does it pay to treat every acre with an insecticide when only a few acres will be affected? Do your replant costs over the years justify this annual expense? Or do you believe that the increased stand and potentially higher yield shown in some experiments justify the added cost of seed treatments or liquid insecticides for seedling attacking insects?

Research results

One seedling insect complex that has had little research data available is white grubs. In 2005, we were fortunate to discover a field that had a significant infestation in corn. The field was located just west of Randolph in Cedar County. The white grub was identified as Phyllophaga implicita, a three-year grub often associated with damage to crops in the Midwest. In this experiment several seed treatments, granular and liquid insecticides were applied at planting to try to protect the seedlings from damage. The data summarized in Table 1 is the final stand count taken on June 9. Live plants were counted per 30 foot of row. Stand counts followed by the same letter are not statistically different.

Keith Jarvi
IPM Extension Assistant
Tom Hunt
Extension Entomologist
Both at the Northeast REC
Bob Wright
Extension Entomologist
UNL-Lincoln

Table 1. White Grub Experiment, Randolph, 2005

Product/RateActive IngredientApplication MethodStand Count

F2700 0.8 EC 4 oz/acrezeta-cypermethrinLiquid infurrow37.50 a
Poncho 250clothianidinSeed Treatment36.25 ab
Capture 2EC 2.56 oz/abifenthrinLiquid infurrow36.00 abc
AGST 03001imidaclopridPlanter box35.25 abcd
Aztec 4.67 G 2oz/1000 row ft tebupirimphos+cyfluthrinGranular infurrow with Smartbox34.75 abcde
Fortress 2.5 G 7.4 oz/1000 row ftchlorethoxyfosGranlar infurrow with Smartbox34.50 abcde
Fortress 5 G 1.5 oz/1000 row ftchlorethoxyfosGranular infurrow with Smartbox34.50 abcde
Fortress 2.5 G 3 oz/1000 row ftchlorethoxyfosGranular infurrow with Smartbox33.75 bcdef
Poncho 1250clothianidinSeed Treatment33.50 bcdef
Cruiser .125 + A14115thiamethoxamSeed Treatment33.25 bcdef
Cruiser 1.25thiamethoxamSeed Treatment33.00 bcdef
Fortress 1 G 7.5 oz/1000 row ftchlorethoxyfosGranular infurrow with Smartbox 32.50 cdef
Fortress 2.5 G 6 oz/1000 row ftchlorethoxyfosGranular infurrow with Smartbox32.25 def
F2700 0.8 EC 2.88 oz/azeta-cypermethrinLiquid infurrow32.00 def
AGST 02002bifenthrinPlanter box31.75 defg
Regent 2 oz/acrefipronilLiquid infurrow31.50 efg
Regent 6.2 FSfipronilSeed Treatment30.75 fg
Regent 3 oz/acrefipronilLiquid infurrow30.50 fg
Regent 500 FSfipronilSeed treatment28.25 gh
Untreated25.75 h

You've got mail!
To receive Email notification when the latest Crop Watch is posted to the Web, use this form. Please provide your email address and subscriber name (required) and your mail address and areas of interest.

Copyright 2006 by the University of Nebraska
Published by University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperating with the counties and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln does not discriminate on the basis of gender, age, disability, race, color, religion, marital status, veteran's status, national or ethnic origin, or sexual orientation.