University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperative Extension


With record corn harvests expected, active management of the harvest and storage operation can help producers reap the benefits. See this week's CropWatch for tips on getting the most out of your harvest. (File photo)
(Photo by Brett Hampton)

September 10; updated September 17, 2004

Harvest and Storage
Actively manage harvest to limit losses
Tips for drying and storing grain
Layering grain speeds up drying process
Production Management
Crops maturing under dry conditions
Nebraska 2004 corn production record high
Use fall field assessments to fine-tune 2005 management
Fertility
Test corn stalks for nitrogen; adjust plans
Assessing and meeting wheat nitrogen needs
Use soil tests as a basis for fertilizer decisions
New software guides nutrient planning
Nutrient software uses geospatial data
Weed Control
Saltcedar digs in for the long term
Insect Control
Soybean stem borer in south central Nebraska
Alfalfa & Grazing
Swath grazing of damaged corn
Conditions conducive to development of alfalfa rust
Ag Programs/Resources/Updates
Ag briefs and updates
Crop condition report
Nebraska cattle on feed up 8%
Events calendar
You've got mail!
To receive Email notification when the latest Crop Watch is posted to the Web, complete this form. Please provide your email address and subscriber name (required) and your mail address and areas of interest.

Actively manage harvest to limit losses

In a year like this when yields are expected to be above normal, harvest losses may be less visible. A drop from 150 to 130 bushels per acre hardly seems worth noting for a field that may have produced just 10-20 bushels per acre last year. But this year’s high yields are only as good as the crop that actually makes it from the field to the bin. Every bit of grain lost during harvest and storage is income or feed value that’s lost to your operation.

A good crop is only as good as the grain that makes it from the field to the bin.
To get the most yield from your crop, actively manage the combine operation as part of a total harvest system. Take advantage of the monitors and technologies available on your combine to guide adjustments and improve harvest efficiency and productivity. Following are a few tips to aid your harvest operation.

First, ensure that harvest equipment is clean and in working order before harvest starts. Thoroughly examine the combine and grain trucks with a critical eye. Look for wear or damage to belts, bearings, and hoses. Double check truck beds for leakage -- two to three bushels a trip can add up. Review maintenance records and if necessary, the owner’s manual, to help determine if it’s likely that a critical part may need to be replaced during harvest. Either replace worn parts or have them readily available on-farm so harvest delays can be minimized. To help minimize grain damage, smooth or file down any sharp or rough edges that are likely to contact grain.

Second, if you’re using yield monitors and other gauges, check to be sure they’re properly adjusted and calibrated to provide accurate readouts. Making “on-the go” decisions based on inaccurate information can be costly.

Third, adjust your combine for current conditions and expected yields. This is especially important for dryland corn and soybean producers who may have made combine adjustments the last two years to handle lower yields. Check the owner’s manual and readjust settings, such as for the cylinder or rotor and concave. Many of these changes are fairly easy to make now – often from the cab – but if overlooked, can contribute to crop damage or losses.

Fourth, once these adjustments are made, continue monitoring the process throughout the day and be prepared to readjust settings. Conditions in mid afternoon may be totally different from when you started in early morning. Check the amount of crop material going into the grain tank as well as the amount of grain that may be lost out of the back of the combine.

Spot checks in the field throughout the day can be very important and eliminate unnecessary losses. Air temperature, crop moisture, soils, and crop variety can vary from one field to the next and through the day. With an especially warm day and a steady southerly breeze, crash drying can occur and moisture can drop by up to 5%. Managers should stay on top of the changes and adjust the combine accordingly throughout the day and again the next morning. With today’s monitors farmers can do a lot of management from the cab, but they also need to get out of the cab intermittently to check for losses.

Always try to run the combine at full capacity to increase harvest efficiency and reduce grain damage. With too little crop going through, the action can become too aggressive and the grain will be damaged. Maintaining grain quality pays through better prices at the elevator or grain that stores better with fewer complications.

Combines are designed to work best when there’s a consistent flow of grain. When the amount of grain going into the combine drops by half, each kernel or bean suffers two to three times the number of blows from the cylinder and concave. With high yield areas it may be necessary to slow down so as not to overload the system and in lower yielding areas, it may be necessary to speed up some. Remember that while increasing combine speed may increase the flow and the quality, it also can introduce more plant material and increase separation losses. At the onset of harvest in the field, check to see if there are any losses and if so, the source of those losses, such as from the header, thresher, or separator.

Taking a little time at the onset of harvest and intermittently throughout harvest can help ensure a productive and successful harvest.

William Campbell
Extension Agricultural Engineer
Lisa Jasa
CropWatch Editor


Dry and store grain for quality returns

Successful grain storage and management is a long-term operation, starting when the grain is placed in the bin and continuing until it goes to market. As such, it can have a major impact on the total income you realize from your crop. The following reminders are included to help you maintain your crop’s value throughout the storage period.

Check grain condition frequently

In summary, the secret to having good quality grain coming out of storage, is to store good quality grain in the first place. Harvest it with clean equipment, put it in clean bins, dry it to a safe storage moisture content as soon as possible after harvest, then cool the grain to prevent insect and mold activity. Finally, check grain condition at least once a month and keep the temperature uniform throughout the grain mass by periodically running the aeration fan.

Tom Dorn
Extension Educator
Based in Lancaster County

Layer grain placement to speed up drying

Want to dry grain 20-35% faster with your in-bin drying setup? Try filling your bin in layers instead of all at once.

I recently completed a computer simulation looking at the time needed to dry grain using a drying bin. The simulation compared drying a full bin of grain to drying the same number of bushels in the same bin but drying the grain in layers instead of all at once. Scenarios included using natural air (60oF and 50% relative humidity), heating the air to 80oF, heating the air to 95oF, and heating the air to 110oF.

The moisture content of the grain was assumed to be 20% on the first day, but when filling the bin in layers, the initial moisture content of each succeeding layer was assumed to drop one- quarter percentage point per day because of the natural drying that occurs in the field. For the simulations where the bin was filled in layers, one-quarter of the bin was filled with each successive layer (4.5 feet per layer) making the grain 18 feet deep after the fourth layer. The computer calculated the time to bring each succeeding layer down to 15.5% moisture.

Results of a simulation1 comparing the time required to dry an 18-foot depth of grain in a bin by using various methods to dry either the whole bin or to dry it in layers.

DryingDays to dryTotal days to dryDays to dry
methodfull binin layersindividual layers

Natural air drying 14.59.22.49, 2.31, 2.19, 2.17
Heated to 80oF6.124.51.05, 1.07, 1.12, 1.24
Heated to 95oF5.083.80.87,0.90, 0.95, 1.07
Heated to 110oF3.742.90.64, 0.67, 0.72, 0.82

1Simulations were run assuming a Caldwell F24-10, 10.5 hp axial flow fan on a 27 ft diameter bin with a full mesh drying floor. Maximum grain depth, 18 ft. Total storage capacity 8,241 bushels.

Note: In the real world, the grain continues to dry down if the fan is allowed to continue to run after the grain has reached the target moisture content. Drying continues until the grain reaches an equilibrium moisture content that is a function of the temperature and humidity of the air passing through the grain. The grain in the bottom of the bin will become over-dried by the time the grain in the top of the bin is at the desired moisture content.

Based on the temperature and humidity for the four scenarios, the corn at the bottom of the bin would approach 10.9% moisture with natural air drying, 7.5% when heated to 80oF, 5.6% when heated to 95oF and 3.7% when heated to 110oF.

If the grain was, in fact, dried until the top of the bin was at 15.5% moisture, actual drying times would be longer in all cases due to the time required for the air to remove the additional water from the over-dried grain in the lower portion of the bin. Since drying the whole bin in one filling requires longer drying times than drying in layers, more total water will be removed from the lower part of the bin. This results in even greater percentage differences between drying a full bin and drying in layers than is shown in the table.

Tom Dorn
Extension Educator
Based in Lancaster County

Crops maturing under dry conditions

Crop condition report

The USDA Nebraska Agricultural Statistics Service reported Tuesday that corn condition rated 3% very poor, 7% poor, 17% fair, 50% good, and 23% excellent, above last year and average. Irrigated fields rated 84% good and excellent while dryland fields rated 56%. This compares to 73% and 10%, respectively, a year ago.

Soybean condition declined and rated 4% very poor, 12% poor, 30% fair, 44% good, and 10% excellent, still well above last year and average.

Sorghum condition declined and rated 18% poor and very poor, 38% fair, 37% good, and 7% excellent, still well above last year and average.

Alfalfa conditions rated 13% very poor, 20% poor, 28% fair, 32% good, and 7% excellent.

Dry bean conditions declined and rated 6% very poor, 15% poor, 25% fair, 43% good, and 11% excellent. Twenty-five percent had turned color, well behind last year at 67% and average at 69%.Four percent were harvested, behind 6% last year and 13% average.

Proso millet harvest was 6% complete, well behind last year at 28%.

Wheat seeding was 8% planted to date, near last year's 9% and an average of 6% at this time.

Pasture and range condition rated 16% very poor, 27% poor, 30% fair, 26% good, and 1% excellent, but remained above a year ago and average. Dusty conditions were becoming a problem in feedlots.

With one eye on the weatherman and the other on their fields, Nebraska growers are marking time as delayed but very promising corn, soybean and sorghum crops continue maturing, trying to beat an early frost.

Al Dutcher, Extension state climatologist, said Wednesday that “models have backed off of freezing temperatures in the near term. Normal to above normal temps are projected for the next seven days, before cooler weather arrives as early as next weekend.” The current models don’t indicate when a first freeze may occur, but a “significant cool down” does appear likely.

This year’s unusually cool summer affected both crops and pests. In June and July, crop development began lagging as average temperatures in Nebraska dropped 1.5-6 degrees Fahrenheit below normal. The Nebraska Agricultural Statistics Service Monday reported that 64% of the corn crop had dented, behind last year at 73% and average at 80%. Thirty-two percent of the soybean acreage was turning color, behind average at 40%, and 37% of the sorghum fields were showing color, behind average at 60%.

Bob Klein, Extension cropping systems specialist in the West Central REC at North Platte, said crops there were progressing well and that most would make it to maturity unless there’s an early freeze. The exception will be those fields which were replanted following the May 14 freeze, “some of which have quite a ways to go,” he said. In addition fields that appeared earlier to be recovering from the freeze and were not replanted now appear to have suffered more stand loss than originally believed, he said.

Producers in south central Nebraska who replanted after a May 22 frost also are hoping for a reprieve from an early frost.

“Really, the biggest problem here is that it’s so dry,” Klein said. “We’ll be ending the season with no moisture in our soil profile. That’s not unusual here -- that’s why we fallow -- but a good rain would help.”

Jerry Volesky, range specialist at the WCREC, agreed. “We received some maintenance rains, but a lot of the summer rains were too fast and too heavy to soak in.”

The lack of moisture is particularly difficult for wheat growers preparing to plant. For those planting after a fallow season, there should be enough moisture to get the wheat up and growing, Klein said. In non-fallow fields, however, topsoil moisture is very limited or nonexistent and a lot of seedbeds are loose. Tillage, for example with a disk, would be discouraged in these situations, Klein said, because of the potential for drying the soil even further.

The lack of moisture is speeding crop development and yield reductions are likely, he said, noting that several inches of water would make a big difference. There are some predictions of rain in the next 7-10 days, which may be affected by the path that Hurricane Ivan takes.

If it comes into lower Texas, Nebraska stands an outside chance of some significant moisture sweeping up into the state, Dutcher said.

Roger Elmore, Extension crops specialist, noted that pivot corners were drying down and maturing before the pivot areas, as is expected but doesn’t always happen.

“When we’ve had a poor spring and a poor soybean pod set in dryland areas but good moisture at the end of the season, plants tend to stay green longer,” he said. They keep trying to nourish the nonexistent or smaller number of pods. Generally this year, plants had set on a good number of pods and seeds before irrigation started and should be able to finish the year well.

“We should see a big response from well-timed irrigation this year,” Elmore said.

Several Extension specialists expressed concern, however, that producers may have discontinued irrigation too early, both in corn and soybeans.

“A lot of years farmers stop irrigating around Labor Day, but that wasn’t necessarily the case this year,” Elmore said. In many areas crops would have benefited from continued irrigation -- for soybean, into mid September.

Irrigation should be scheduled according to growth stage, heat units, moisture needs and available moisture, not by the date on the calendar, specialists said.

As irrigation winds down and harvest approaches, growers can scout for potential stalk or root damage and check fields to see if any are vulnerable to high winds or storms. While lodging and stand problems haven't been widespread, some fields may have significant problems and should be harvested before other fields to avoid yield loss.

Lisa Jasa
CropWatch Editor



Nebraska 2004 corn production record high

Based on September 1 conditions, Nebraska's 2004 corn production is forecast at 1.24 billion bushels, up 1% from last month and 10% above 2003. This production is fractionally above the previous high set in 1998, according to USDA's Nebraska Agricultural Statistics Service. Acreage to be harvested for grain remained unchanged at 7.9 million acres, up 3% from last year. Average yield is forecast at a record high 157 bushels per acre, 2 bushels above last month, 11 bushels above last year, and 10 bushels above the previous high set in 2001.

"While August was drier and cooler than normal, a record high ear count combined with the largest average ear size since 1994, continue to point toward an exceptional corn crop.

For soybeans, the dry August resulted in some of the later blooms not setting pods, decreasing yield potential," said Mark Harris, director, Nebraska Agricultural Statistics Service.

Soybean production in Nebraska is forecast at 212 million bushels, 2% below last month, but 18% above last year and second highest on record behind 2001. Acres for harvest at 4.7 million are unchanged from last month and are second highest on record. Yield is forecast at 45 bushels per acre, down 1 bushel from August but up 5 bushels from 2003.

Sorghum production in Nebraska is forecast at 35.7 million bushels, unchanged from the August forecast and 15% above last year. Acres for harvest at 420,000 are unchanged from the August forecast. Yield is forecast at 85 bushels per acre, unchanged from the previous month and up 23 bushels from last year.

Sugarbeet production of 952 thousand tons is down 1% from last month, but up 11% from 2003. Yield at 20.0 tons per acre is down 0.2 ton from last month and 0.3 ton from last year.

Access this release at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bb/2004/crop0904.pdf

Soybean stem borer in south central Nebraska

The soybean stem borer beetle (Dectes) has been observed in south central Nebraska soybean fields this summer. In the late 1990s Kansas State University entomologists reported that this insect was increasing in numbers in north central Kansas and causing economic loss. In 2000, this insect was confirmed to be causing economic damage in a soybean field in Thayer County, Nebraska, just across the Kansas-Nebraska border.

The soybean stem borer, a relatively new pest to Nebraska, can weaken stems and complicate harvest.
Apparently it is becoming more common in south central Nebraska.

This is a native insect that has been reported in the central and eastern United States from Texas to Canada. It can grow in a variety of broadleaf weeds, including cocklebur, common and giant ragweed, sunflower, as well as soybeans. It has one generation a year.

Adults are a light gray, narrow beetle, about 0.5 inch long, with the antennae longer than the body. Adults lay eggs in the upper petioles of soybean leaves in mid-summer. As the eggs hatch the larva feeds inside the stem and moves down the plant as it matures. At maturity it is about 0.75 inch long, legless and cream-colored. At maturity the larva girdles the inside of the stem just above ground as part of its preparation of an overwintering cell. This stem girdling predisposes the stem to breakage, especially if strong winds occur before harvest. If you notice broken stems in a soybean field, check to see if you can find a Dectes larva at the base of the stem to confirm that this is what is causing the breakage.

Foliar insecticides treatments are not effective against the larvae and are not economically feasible against the adults because of their extended period of emergence during the summer. Nonchemical controls include harvesting infested fields first to avoid harvest losses, control of the alternate weed hosts near soybean fields, and crop rotation.

Bob Wright
Extension Entomologist

Use fall field assessments to fine-tune 2005 management

Events calendar

Information about these events is available in this and previous issues of CropWatch.

September

October

From taking notes at harvest to taking soil tests in the field, a variety of fall activities and measurements can help producers assess their 2004 management practices and improve on them for 2005.

Following are some of the recommendations from Extension specialists:


Fall management: Test corn stalks for nitrogen; adjust plans

With energy prices climbing again, higher nitrogen prices could develop next spring. If prices increase, there may be a temptation to lower nitrogen application rates. Taking time this fall to evaluate the efficiency of the nitrogen application rate you’re currently using can help provide information on which to base any changes next spring.

(Above) Take an 8-inch segment of cornstalk from 6 inches to 14 inches above the ground. (Right) Stalk samples should be kept cool and wrapped in paper rather than plastic to avoid mold.
Taking corn stalk samples now can help determine if the corn was under, adequately or over fertilized with nitrogen. If the nitrogen applied this year was greater than that recommended by the University of Nebraska and this fall’s stalk nitrate samples indicated excess nitrogen, consider reducing nitrogen rates for next season.

Use the corn stalk nitrate test in irrigated fields where moisture was not limiting. Fields that tend to have high stalk nitrate tests are those where manure or excess nitrogen was applied and fields following alfalfa. Iowa State University developed the corn stalk nitrate test, and its usefulness has been verified in other states. A full explanation and discussion of the test can be found in the NU Cooperative Extension publication, The Corn Stalk Nitrate Test, NF01-491.

What does the test show?

The results of the corn stalk nitrate test indicate whether the corn was over fertilized during the season. The test shows low, optimal and excess stalk nitrate values (Table 1). Low values indicate nitrogen may have been deficient. Excess values indicate that there was more nitrogen than the plant needed to produce grain. The scientific basis for this test is the fact that corn will continue to accumulate nitrogen past the level at which grain yield is increased. Since corn does not show visible symptoms of excess nitrogen, analysis of the stalk tissue can determine when this occurs. This test is probably best used for finding excess nitrogen since deficiencies can be spotted visually by leaf yellowing.

This season, if the test comes back in the “excess” range, that indicates that reductions in nitrogen may be possible next season. (For more information on recommended rates, see the NU Extension NebGuide, Fertilizer Suggestions for Corn (G174) or visit the Managing Nitrogen Efficiently in Nebraska Crop Production Web site, where there are worksheets and an on-line calculator to help determine recommended nitrogen rates.)

How to take the test

Take corn stalk samples up to three weeks after black layer formation in 80% of the kernels. Newly published information indicates that the stalk test can be taken as early as when the milk line is one-fourth of the way down the kernel. To take the test, remove an 8-inch segment from 6 inches to 14 inches above the ground.

Remove the sheaths. Don’t take diseased stalks or stalks damaged by hail or insects. Take 15 stalks per sample, keep them cool and send to the laboratory immediately. Samples should be sent in paper wrapping and not plastic since plastic wrapped samples may mold. Have the samples analyzed for nitrates. An article (Fox et al., July 2001) in the Agronomy Journal compared the stalk test, late season chlorophyll meter, and green leaf count techniques.

Based on this article, I have summarized their analysis of the results in Table 2. The authors used experimental data to determine the error rate of using different critical levels to interpret the test results. Because the tests were conducted on corn grown in replicated experiments, they could determine if the diagnostic test level accurately matched the plant response. Their criteria for whether the test was valid was whether the yield was at 93% of maximum yield. For example, with the chlorophyll readings taken at one-fourth milk line they used a critical value meter reading of 52. They derived the 52 reading from their previous research.

Once the criteria was set, they determined if the treatment correctly predicted sufficient nitrogen. They also divided the errors into two groups: one predicted the plant was nitrogen deficient when it wasn’t while the other predicted the plant had adequate nitrogen when it was deficient. Using the chlorophyll meter reading to determine if the plant had adequate nitrogen wrongly predicted the crop was deficient 13.4% of the time. The plant actually had adequate nitrogen even though the meter suggested it was low. Using the same meter reading criteria, 1.7% of the time it falsely suggested the plant had adequate nitrogen when it was low.

When the authors lowered the criteria from 52 to 48, the total error rate actually decreased from 15.1% to 7.3% because the percent the meter falsely predicted deficiency decreased from 13.4% to 2.7%. There was not a corresponding increase in the false prediction of adequate nitrogen.

The data on the stalk nitrates also shows the change of error rates when the criteria for predicting deficiency changes. The Fox et al. data indicates that using 250 ppm would keep prediction errors to 7.2%. Using the 700 ppm critical value used by Iowa had a 0% error rate for falsely predicting nitrogen sufficiency and a 12% overall error rate.

The Fox et al. data provide more evidence that corn stalk nitrate tests are a useful tool in nitrogen management. They are best used to determine if adequate nitrogen was available. They would be especially useful in fields with manure history where the producer needs reassurance that reducing fertilizer nitrogen will not affect yields. This year they may also help producers determine if reducing nitrogen rates decreased yields.

Charles Shapiro
Extension Soils Specialist

Haskell Ag Lab, Northeast REC

Table 1. Interpretation of the test results
Plant nitrogen status Stalk nitrate (ppm) Management suggestions

Low 0-250 Increase nitrogen
Marginal 250-700 Increase nitrogen
Optimal 700-2000 Yields are not limited by nitrogen stress
Excess Greater than 2000 Plant nitrogen greater than needed

Table 2. Summary of diagnostic techniques, critical values and error rates. (after Fox et al., 2001. Agronomy Journal 93:590-597)
Samples in database Diagnostic techniqueCritical value Falsely predict N deficient Falsely predict N sufficient
----------- % ----------

702
Chlorophyll meter at 1/4 Milkline growth stage
52
13.4
1.7
702
48
2.7
4.6
209
Stalk nitrates at black layer
250 ppm
5.3
1.9
209
700 ppm
12.1
0.0

Potentially the next state noxious weed

Saltcedar digs in for the long term

A saltcedar plant in northeast Nebraska. Plants can grow up to 20 feet tall and may have roots extending 15-150 feet deep, depending on the availability of water.
Saltcedar (Taramix ramosissima), also known as tamarisk, is an invasive weed introduced from Eurasia and found in Nebraska’s wetland habitats in all soil types. It is a perennial deciduous or evergreen shrub or small tree from the tamarisk family (Tamaricaceae) that reproduces both by seeds and perennial structures such as taproot and stem.

Its root system is extensive. Its primary taproot easily grows to 15 feet and when searching for moisture, as deep as 150 feet. Once the water table is reached, secondary root branching becomes profuse. The plants can grow as individual trees or in sparse groups. It has an erect woody stem that can grow up to 20 feet tall, brown or reddish brown bark and highly branched saplinks. Leaves are small and scale-like (as in many cedar trees) with many divisions on slender highly branched green stems.

In Nebraska, saltcedar can flower from June to August, with small pink flowers positioned on the top of the main woody stem and branches (saplinks) in finger-like clusters. The flowers produce small, numerous, and tufted seeds that can be carried a long distance by wind and water. The seeds, however, have a short period of viability, and need to contact suitable moisture within a few weeks of dispersal.Saltcedar is sold as an ornamental plant species, but has escaped and become naturalized along streams, canals and reservoirs in much of the western United States. In addition, in early 1900 saltcedar was purposely planted along stream banks for soil erosion control.

There are several means by which saltcedar can injure the natural habitat. Its high evapo-transpiration rate can lower the water table in streams and canals. The salt excreted from the leaves to the soil surface under the plant inhibits germination and growth of competing species. Thus the name “saltcedar” is derived from the salty residue that collects on the small scale-like leaves. The sticky salty substance exuded by the leaves can damage bird plumage and with the loss of habitat, most wildlife species will move to more diverse native plant communities.

Control recommendations

Due to its detrimental effect on both wildlife and land, salt cedar should be controlled in its early stages. If you’ve identified salt cedar on your property, use the following guidelines to establish control.

In Nebraska, saltcedar flowers from June to August, with small pink flowers gathered in finger-like clusters on top of the main woody stem and branches.

Stevan Knezevic
Extension Weeds Specialist
Haskell Ag Lab, Northeast REC


Assessing, meeting winter wheat nitrogen needs

Most Nebraska winter wheat will benefit from adding nitrogen. This is true for virtually all Nebraska soils unless there is a large carry-over of fertilizer nitrogen.

Nitrogen applications have a high probability of increasing yield when soil nitrogen availability is low in relation to yield potential; however, studies also have shown yield depression due to nitrogen fertilizer application. Yield depressions have occurred more often with fall applications than with spring topdressing applications, but incidents have been relatively rare and this should not dissuade growers from applying nutrients in the fall. (Where yield drops occurred, it was thought that fall applications tended to stimulate increased fall growth, which depletes the soil moisture supply and may increase susceptibility to disease.)

If yield depression is a concern, especially in western Nebraska, a spring topdressing is highly recommended. This allows time for the producer to evaluate yield potential based on stands and soil moisture in the spring. Topdressing should be completed before April 15 or prior to jointing.

Wheat grain yields generally decrease and grain protein increases as a result of later nitrogen applications. Yield decreases due to nitrogen application also can occur on soils high in available nitrogen. When available nitrogen is too high, lodging often results, especially with high soil moisture in the spring. This reinforces the importance of soil tests.

The optimum nitrogen rate (lbs N/acre) for winter wheat (with a maximum rate of 100 lbs N/acre for dryland, and 150 lbs N/acre for irrigated) is calculated using the following equation:

((N PRICE / WHEAT PRICE) + 0.014558 x NO3-N - 0.235) / -0.00138

Where,

— N PRICE is the price of nitrogen fertilizer in dollars per pound
— WHEAT PRICE is the price of wheat in dollars per bushel
— NO3-N is the average ppm nitrate-N in the top three feet of soil.

Table 1 shows the nitrogen recommendations (lbs N/acre) for wheat for various nitrogen and wheat prices at several soil nitrate concentrations.

Nitrogen sources

All nitrogen fertilizer sources (ammonium nitrate (33-0-0); urea (45-0-0); urea-ammonium nitrate (28-0-0); and anhydrous ammonia (82-0-0)) are generally very effective. Dry and liquid nitrogen vary in their susceptibility to volatilization or gaseous loss as ammonia to the atmosphere. Ammonium nitrate is the least susceptible, while urea is usually most susceptible. When incorporation is impossible, ammonium nitrate is the preferred nitrogen fertilizer for topdressing. With incorporation soon after application, all nitrogen sources should be equally effective.

Anhydrous ammonia is the most economical source, especially under normal tillage; however, if applied with standard knife applicators, the increased power requirements increase application costs, reducing potential cost savings. Depending on local pricing, ammonia application rates must be more than 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre to be more economical than other nitrogen sources. It is possible to topdress ammonia, but special applicators equipped with narrow knives are required to avoid damaging wheat stands. In western fallow areas, ammonia is generally the best nitrogen source to avoid drying the soil prior to seeding, if it is applied early in the fallow period.

Fertilizing for grain protein. Traditionally Nebraska wheat has been high in protein and quality, desirable characteristics for the baking industry. The amount of nitrogen available to the wheat crop directly affects grain protein content. Under high soil nitrogen availability, grain protein is often 13% or higher, depending on yield levels. If soil nitrogen is low, grain protein tends to decrease as grain yield decreases. Since grain protein reflects soil nitrogen availability, it can suggest when wheat yield will increase with applied nitrogen. A grain protein level of 12-13% with an average yield indicates adequate nitrogen. If grain protein is in 9-10%, however, yield response to nitrogen is probable. A producer using University of Nebraska fertilizer recommendations for nitrogen probably will produce wheat with a grain protein of about 12%. If the goal is for higher grain protein to obtain premium grain prices, about 20 pounds per acre of additional nitrogen will need to be topdressed in the spring for each 1% increase in grain protein.

Fertilizing after high yields. In high residue continuous wheat following a crop of 70 bushels per acre (about 20 bushels per acre above normal) 20 pounds of nitrogen per acre may need to be added for proper straw decomposition to prevent yield limitations to the following wheat crop.

David D. Tarkalson
Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management Specialist
West Central REC

Table I. Nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for wheat.
Wheat Price
($/bu)
$2.50
$3.00
$3.50
$4.00
Fertilizer Price
($/lb N)
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.30
Nitrogen Application Rate
(Lb N /A)
Nitrogen Application Rate
(Lb N /A)
Nitrogen Application Rate
(Lb N /A)
Nitrogen Application Rate
(Lb N /A)
Soil Test N (ppm)
1
102
87
73
111
99
87
118
108
98
124
114
105
2
91
77
62
101
89
77
108
97
87
113
104
95
3
81
66
52
90
78
66
97
87
77
102
93
84
4
70
56
41
80
68
56
87
76
66
92
83
74
5
60
45
31
69
57
45
76
66
55
81
72
63
6
49
35
20
59
47
35
66
55
45
71
62
53
7
38
24
9
48
36
24
55
45
34
60
51
42
8
28
13
0
38
26
13
44
34
24
50
41
32
9
17
3
0
27
15
3
34
24
13
39
30
21
10
7
0
0
16
4
0
23
13
3
29
20
10
11
0
0
0
6
0
0
13
2
0
18
9
0
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
7
0
0

Use soil tests as basis for fertilizer decisions

The best guideline for determining crop fertilizer needs is a soil analysis based on a laboratory test of representative soil samples from the field. Because soil nitrate is very mobile and can vary from year to year, an annual soil sample is necessary. Other nutrients, including phosphorus, potassium, and micronutrients, can be sampled every three to five years.

To collect representative samples, proper procedures must be followed. For a comprehensive overview of soil sampling guidelines, see the NebGuide, Guidelines for Soil Sampling. Soil samples should be taken to a depth of at least three feet for residual nitrate levels and eight inches for phosphorus, potassium, and micronutrients.

While spring soil sampling is an option, we recommend sampling in late fall or winter, except when testing for nitrate-nitrogen in sandy soils. Fall sampling allows the laboratory more time to process the results and the grower more time to develop a plan based on the results.

Fall sampling should provide meaningful results for all nutrients; however, excessive rainfall between sampling and planting may result in some leaching of nitrate-nitrogen to greater soil depths. If more than 8 inches of effective rainfall (total which percolates into the soil) occurs on fine textured soils during this period, leaching may occur and additional samples would be needed. For sandy soils, 4 inches of effective rainfall can cause significant leaching. In these instances, a spring sample would better reflect the nitrate-nitrogen distribution available for initial crop growth.

David D. Tarkalson
Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management Specialist
West Central REC


Swath grazing damaged corn

Hail. Drought. Green snap. Even an early freeze. All these weather events can greatly lower corn grain yield. When this occurs often the grain is used as a forage to get a little more value from it. Traditionally, chopping it for silage has been the most popular option but cutting it for hay or even grazing the standing corn have been used.

There is another forage option, though, that you might want to try this year or in the future — swath grazing.

Swath grazing has some advantages over the other salvage methods. Compared to silage, timing of harvest isn’t as critical for swath grazing and you don’t need storage or as much harvest equipment. Compared to hay, you don’t need to bale and move the feed around. And compared to grazing standing corn, setting fences will be much easier and there will be much less trampling loss.

Swath grazing really is quite simple. The hardest part is making the swath. Thick stalks can be hard to cut and feed cleanly through a swather or windrower. If you have a hay conditioner, remove it or open it as wide as possible, otherwise quite a bit of the grain will be shelled from the ear, fall to the ground, and be lost.

Before you start grazing, be sure to condition cattle to eating grain, otherwise if they selectively eat mostly ears at first they may suffer acidosis. And use fences to force them to clean up most of the swath. Not only does this stretch your feed supply, it also removes residues that could impede next spring’s tillage or planting.

If you plan to salvage corn as a forage, don’t automatically chop silage. Consider swath grazing as an easier and cheaper alternative.

Bruce Anderson
Extension Forage Specialist


Recent weather conducive to rust in alfalfa

Warm, humid weather has caused rust to form in many alfalfa fields throughout our region. Rust rarely infects our alfalfa before mid-July because it won’t overwinter here. But if the summer is humid, like we’ve experienced this year, rust blown up from the south can infect our fields.

Rust usually causes little damage in fields harvested monthly, but more mature alfalfa or alfalfa grown for seed can be injured and defoliated by rust. So one way to minimize damage is to harvest fields infected with rust early.

Rust can cause damage several ways. Heavy rust infections can cause leaf drop and defoliation of alfalfa if plants aren’t cut on a timely basis. This type of injury also will greatly reduce seed yield and quality.

Rust-infected hay sometimes causes allergic reactions in animals, more often with horses than with ruminant livestock. Rust also lowers the digestibility of hay, and this lower energy value often isn’t detected well by standard laboratory tests. If you feed rust-infected hay, your animals may not get as much energy from it as expected.

One of our biggest concerns is late summer seedings infected with rust. Infected seedlings may be weakened and not develop as much winterhardiness as normal, making them more susceptible to winterkill. If your fields have this problem, monitor them closely next spring to determine if a change in cropping plans is warranted. There’s nothing you can do economically to control rust. So monitor, harvest, and adjust plans to minimize damage.

Bruce Anderson
Extension Forage Specialist


Nebraska cattle on feed up 8%

Nebraska feedlots, with capacities of 1,000 or more head, contained 1.8 million cattle on feed on September 1, according to the USDA's Nebraska Agricultural Statistics Service. This inventory was up 8% from last year but 3% below September 1, 2002. Placements in feedlots during August totaled 420,000 head, down 11% from 2003 and 6% below 2002.

Marketings of fed cattle during August totaled 360,000 head, down 3% from last year and 5% below August two years ago. Other disappearance during August totaled 10,000 compared with 10,000 last year and 5,000 during August 2002.

Nationally, cattle and calves on feed in feedlots totaled 9.97 million head on September 1, 2004. The inventory was 1% above September 1, 2003 but 2% below September 1, 2002.

Placements in feedlots during August totaled 2.10 million, 12% below 2003 and 6% below 2002. Marketings of fed cattle during August totaled 1.92 million, 7% below 2003 and 10% below 2002. Other disappearance totaled 56,000 during August, 7% below 2003 but 30% above 2002.


New nutrient planning programs guide input, reports for growers

Two new software programs — Nebraska_CNMP and Nebraska_AMUP — are now available to aid in manure use planning for Nebraska. Both are used with the Manure Management Planner (MMP) from the USDA Natural Resource and Conservation Service and Purdue University. MMP is free and available for download.

Nebraska_CNMP generates a document for a comprehensive nutrient management plan that is needed by animal feeding operations applying for a permit to operate a livestock waste control facility. Nebraska_AMUP generates a document for an annual manure use plan which will be required for maintenance of a permit to operate a livestock waste control facility.

These tools operate with MMP. A fertilizer and manure use plan covering several years is first developed in MMP. When the plan is complete, custom reports can be generated from MMP “Tools”. The Nebraska CNMP and AMUP documents are generated as Microsoft Word documents and are easily edited. Document generation requires Microsoft Access, but Access is not needed to develop a plan in MMP or to edit the generated Word document.

The CNMP and AMUP documents contain tables of information and much of the text needed in the comprehensive plan and annual plan, respectively. Tables and text are fully editable in Word. At places in the CNMP document, the planner can right-click to get a list of phrases from which to select to better adapt the document to the animal feeding operation; this is a function of Microsoft Word’s ‘auto-text’ feature.

MMP cannot provide all of the information needed for the comprehensive and annual plans. The generated CNMP and AMUP documents advise the planner that this information is needed. For each informational need it either provides forms to be completed or provides links to Internet access for the needed forms. These products are among a number of software tools to help producers implement and carry out comprehensive nutrient management planning. The files and instructions for using Nebraska_CNMP and Nebraska_AMUP are available online.

Charles Wortmann
Extension Nutrient Management Specialist


Software uses spatial data for nutrient management

The Spatial Nutrient Management Planner (SNMP) is now available for use in Nebraska. It is available for free download.

SNMP is a decision support tool that uses spatial information in nutrient management planning. With SNMP you can map farm and field boundaries and setback areas; determine sizes of fields, management units, and areas available for manure application; and map fields according to soil test data.

SNMP interacts with Purdue’s Manure Management Planner (MMP) and NRCS’s Customer Service Toolkit. ArcView 3.x is required to run SNMP. This program was developed by John Lory and Arin Stark of the University of Missouri for use nationwide. Information and results, however, are state specific.

Charles Wortmann
Extension Nutrient Management Specialist


About Crop Watch | Agricultural News | Events | Archives | Markets
Ag Links | Weather | Photos | Search
Lisa Jasa, Crop Watch Editor | Publications | IANR

Copyright 2004 by the University of Nebraska
Published by University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperating with the counties and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln does not discriminate on the basis of gender, age, disability, race, color, religion, marital status, veteran's status, national or ethnic origin, or sexual orientation.