|
Focus: Corn
Management
Drought
Fertility
Updates
Alfalfa
Wheat
Resources
Agricultural News
|
Listening sessions will continued at various sites up to April 16. Visit the web site listed below for specific locations and times or contact your local Cooperative Extension office. If you’re planning to attend one of the sessions, please contact the host listed with the meeting information so appropriate arrangements can be made for seating and refreshments. If you are unable to attend a session, you can provide input on IANR priorities and programs online at http://ianrlisten.unl.edu/
This site lists six questions to which you can respond:
IANR listening sessions and web site offer opportunity for input
UNL’s Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources is conducting listening sessions across the state to receive valuable input from its users as IANR revises its strategic plan. This effort is being led by Dr. Alan Baquet, IANR Associate Vice-Chancellor.
Robert Wright
Extension Entomologist
Use no-till to conserve valuable soil moisture
Using no-till or ridge-till can save you far more than fuel, labor, and equipment costs. The savings in soil moisture can be just as important, especially in a year when soil moisture and precipitation are limited or when irrigation is costly and water supplies are limited.
|
Greater yet are the soil moisture losses from evaporation once tillage destroys residue cover. The residue mulch reduces evaporation in several ways: by reducing solar heating of the soil, by keeping drying winds off the soil surface, by insulating the soil to keep it cooler, and by intercepting some of the water as it evaporates. Research has shown that the residue mulch can reduce water losses from evaporation by as much as 3 inches during the season.
While flattened residue makes a better mulch, standing residue is preferred in crop production. Any residue that is standing up and still anchored to the soil is more effective in keeping the wind off the soil surface, reducing wind blown soil losses and the dust storms common in the spring. In addition, anchored standing residue doesn’t have to be cut or handled during subsequent field operations and is far less likely to move with the wind, surface water runoff, or during furrow irrigation. Unlike a flattened mat of residue which may keep the soil surface too cold and wet for planting, the air movement among the standing residue allows more timely field operations while maintaining the benefits of the residue.
|
Tillage also destroys the residue cover that protects the soil from raindrop impact, reducing erosion and crusting of the soil and allowing more rainfall to soak in. The residue also slows water runoff allowing time for infiltration and acts as a mulch to reduce moisture evaporation from the soil.
Some people recommend tillage for herbicide incorporation for better weed control. While very shallow tillage with good soil mixing may help weed control, it also dries the soil and “plants” weed seeds. Deeper tillage dilutes the herbicide with more soil and dries the soil even more. Rainfall will incorporate herbicides more uniformly than a tillage operation, provided the herbicide label allows it and the herbicide is applied early enough to receive adequate rainfall. Usually there is enough rain in early April to activate an early preplant preemergence herbicide; however the chances diminish by waiting until late April or until after planting when weeds may have already started growing.
Higher fuel costs — about 30% more this year — also are a factor when considering tillage. The diesel fuel requirements for the typical disk-disk-field cultivate tillage system is about 3.77 gallons per acre including knifing in fertilizer, planting, and one row crop cultivation. By switching to a no-till system, the fuel use decreases to about 1.43 gallons per acre including knifing in fertilizer, planting, and two sprayings. By eliminating preplant tillage, labor requirements decrease and there is improved timeliness of planting.
Paul Jasa
Extension Engineer
Choosing an effective herbicide strategy is not always an easy task. Producers need to consider many aspects, including economics such as herbicide costs, fuel and time, and biological and environmental factors such as weed species spectrum, soil type, organic matter, herbicide efficacy, herbicide restrictions, annual precipitation, precipitation at application, and the ability to make a timely treatment application. Even when all of these factors are considered, often there is still no perfect choice.
Corn /weed competition
All weeds are not created equal. Each weed species competes differently with corn with some species being much more competitive than others. For example, common sunflower has a competitive index of 10 and is much more competitive than lambsquarters, which has a competitive index of about 2. Understanding the differences between each species and their competitive factors can be very important in determining what weed management strategy will provide the best return on investment.
Since weeds are not created equal we should acknowledge that neither are crops. Each crop differs in its competitive ability as well. Corn is one of the most competitive row crops planted in Nebraska. The relative competitive load necessary to cause a specific yield loss quantifies the competitiveness of a crop. For corn, it would take a competitive load of around 36, per 100 square feet, to cause a 5% yield loss. (100 square feet is approximately 40 feet of row in 30-inch rows.) Sunflower has a competitive index of 10, therefore it would take 3.6 sunflower plants per 100 square feet (3.6 x 10 = 36) to cause a 5% yield reduction in corn. This assumes that the weeds emerge at the same time as the crop.
Accurately calculating yield loss, especially when several species of weeds are present in the field, can be difficult. WeedSOFT, a computer-aided weed management decision support tool, can be purchased from the University of Nebraska to supply this information at the click of a button. Using this type of technology allows for more accurate yield loss analysis and better information for making weed management decisions.
Early preplant and preemergence weed management
Techniques for achieving early season weed control in corn
Warm weather this week across much of the state has been tempting producers to get a jump on planting corn. Of course, the warm weather means weeds can’t be far behind, especially the early germinators like lambsquarters, giant foxtail, velvetleaf, and sunflower.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Before we dive into all of the strategies available, be sure to refer to Table 1 for an explanation of all the terms and acronyms used for preemergent weed control in corn.
Early preplant herbicide applications 10-30 days before planting offer many advantages to most producers, especially no-till farmers. First, early preplant treatments allow producers to burndown winter annuals including henbit and mustards and early summer annuals, including giant ragweed, common sunflower and lambsquarter. This can be very important in a year characterized by drought conditions as these early weeds, while not competing directly with the crop, can quickly rob precious soil moisture.
Second, an early preplant treatment reduces most if not all weed competition as the crop emerges from the soil. Although this early competition may not be the most critical with respect to yield, it can quickly reduce yield as corn enters the two-leaf stage. Another advantage is that in years with limited moisture, the herbicide has a greater chance of being activated before the crop emerges. A disadvantage of the early preplant treatment is decreased longevity of residual activity. Common sense tells you the earlier a herbicide is applied to the soil, the earlier it will stop working. Postemergence programs need to be carefully evaluated before decisions are made and some knowledge of the field’s weed history will be helpful.
Preplant is similar to early preplant in that many of the same herbicides can be used. Treatments are typically made 0-10 days before planting. Preplant doesn’t give you the advantage of catching early weeds, but it may provide the needed residual to set the stage for a good postemergence treatment.
A preemergence treatment, applied after the crop is planted but before emergence, offers many of the same advantages. An additional advantage is that it allows the producer to increase the longevity of the herbicide. This works well with conventionally tilled fields and provides increased management flexibility later in the season as summer annuals begin to emerge.
Table 2 lists labeled preemergence herbicides and their application timings. As always, read, understand, and follow the label supplied with each product. For further evaluation of herbicide efficacy on weeds and weed/crop competition, see the 2003 Guide For Weed Management in Nebraska (EC03-130).
Brady Kappler
Weed Science Educator
Potential nitrogen volatilization in no-till studied
The following article from South Dakota State University was recommended by Charles Shapiro, NU soils scientist -- crop nutrition at the Haskell Ag Lab at Concord.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
When urea is applied to the soil surface, the fertilizer granules often disappear without a significant precipitation event. Very small amounts of water (even moisture absorbed from the air) will dissolve the urea granule. Just because the granules disappear doesn’t mean the nitrogen is lost. The urea is still present but in a sense has melted onto the soil surface and is more prone to hydrolysis than if it were still in the granule form. If significant precipitation (usually regarded as more than 0.25 inch) is received to move the urea into the soil, enough soil particles are present to lessen ammonia loss.
Because the urea to ammonia conversion is an enzymatic reaction, the rate of conversion is greater at warmer temperatures. Since soil temperatures are much lower during the late fall, surface applications of urea have been recommended. However, fall and winter months usually have lower precipitation and the urea is more likely to lie on the surface longer than when applied in the spring.
Urea application timing studies were conducted on no-till corn in eastern South Dakota in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2002. Surface applied urea was applied as per the timing treatments. For each application timing two rates of nitrogen (50 and 100 lbs N/a) were applied. A check plot without nitrogen also was included. The average data from the four years are presented.
Nitrogen rate significantly influenced average grain yield over the four years and yield increased with each level. Application time also significantly influenced grain yield. Average grain yields from the late fall and winter applications were significantly lower than the planting and V6 timings. Loss of nitrate-N to leaching does not appear to be a contributing factor because departures from average precipitation for the months April to June were - 4.19 inches (1998), 1.64 inches (1999), 1.99 inches (2000), and - 2.62 inches (2002).
Precipitation data was summarized as days after urea application to the first precipitation event of 0.25 inch or more. As expected, the late fall and winter applications had the greatest number of days to this first precipitation event. The fewest days were recorded with the planting and V6 application timings. The longer urea lays on the soil surface, the greater the chance of ammonia volatilization, especially under moist, warm conditions. However the temperatures were cooler during the fall and winter applications as compared to the spring applications. Apparently, low temperature conversion of urea to ammonia and volatilization can take place although probably very slowly. Data from Canada indicate if the soil surface is wet and soil temperature is near 50oF, losses were about 1.5 lb of nitrogen a day. In the South Dakota studies, the affect that warmer temperature might have had on nitrogen volatilization was diminished with the occurrence of precipitation soon after nitrogen application as seen with the planting and V6 application timings. This data would suggest that nitrogen is lost through volatilization when significant rainfall after nitrogen application is delayed even if temperatures are relatively cool.
We appreciate the financial support of the SD Corn Utilization Council for partial funding of these studies.
Anthony Bly, Research Associate
Ron Gelderman, Professor
South Dakota State University
(Reprinted with permission from the March 12 Dakota Dirt, a publication of the SDSU Soil Testing Lab.)
Monsanto has received EPA registration of the MON863 event expressing this protein, and several companies will be marketing YieldGard® hybrids which utilized this event. An article in the March 7 CropWatch described the refuge requirements for MON863 hybrids, which differ in several ways from the refuge requirements for previous Bt corn hybrids.
The table below summarizes results from a replicated small plot (4 row x 30 feet) trial conducted in 2002 at the South Central Research and Extension Center Research Farm near Clay Center. The trial evaluated a MON863 hybrid and its sister line for efficacy against western corn rootworms. Levels of feeding injury were assessed in mid-July using the 0-3 node injury rating scale developed at Iowa State University. This scale is different than the 1-6 scale commonly used in the past for corn rootworm insecticide efficacy trials across the Midwest. On the 0-3 scale, 1=1 node of roots pruned to within 1.5 inches of the stalk, 2=2 nodes pruned, and 3=3 nodes pruned. Partial units represent the fractional portion of a node pruned.
This study was planted in an area late planted to corn the year before, so there was heavy rootworm pressure (2.96) in the untreated isoline. The YieldGard hybrid has significantly lower root injury than any of the soil insecticide or seed treatment rootworm insecticides evaluated. The best soil insecticide treatment was significantly less effective than the YieldGard hybrid, although all the soil insecticide and seed treatments did provide significant root protection, compared with the untreated isoline. Similar results were obtained in a study at Clay Center in 2001. Limited seed was available for these trials, and no yield data were taken in either year.
Additional information about the 2002 study and results from the 2001 study at Clay Center are available at http://screc.unl.edu/entomology/CRW/scalcrwrescorn.htm.
In Nebraska trials:
UNL entomologists have conducted trials at various locations over the last few years with the Monsanto corn hybrids expressing the insecticidal Cry3Bb1 Bt protein. This protein is expressed in the roots and is active against corn rootworm larvae. This is a different Bt protein than has been used in past Bt hybrids which were active against European corn borer and other caterpillars. The Cry3Bb1 protein is coleoptera- (beetle) specific and is not active against European corn borers.
Efficacy of YieldGard Rootworm® resistant corn
Extension Entomologist
South Central Ag Laboratory
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nozzles break the liquid into droplets, form the spray pattern, and propel the droplets in the proper direction. They determine the amount of spray volume at a given operating pressure, travel speed, and spacing. Drift can be minimized by selecting nozzles that produce the largest droplet size while providing adequate coverage at the intended application rate and pressure.
Selecting the right sprayer nozzle tip for the job
Proper selection of a nozzle type and size is essential for proper pesticide application. The nozzle tip is a major factor in determining the amount of spray applied to an area, the uniformity of application, coverage of the target, and the amount of potential drift.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The size of the spray particle is important because it affects both efficacy and spray drift of the pesticide. If you double the size of the spray particle (for example 300 to 600 microns) and the application volume stays the same, you have only 1/8 as many spray droplets. For optimum efficacy and 10 to 20 gallon spray volumes a medium droplet size is suggested for contact non-translocating herbicides and a coarse droplet size for contact translocating herbicides. Concern for drift may cause you to consider larger droplet sizes and higher spray volumes.
For preplant and preemergence herbicide application without a burndown herbicide and with liquid fertilizer, use nozzle tips which produce a very coarse or extremely coarse droplet size. The larger spray particles help reduce drift and evaporation. This is because nozzle tips which produce larger spray particles produce less small droplets.
Table 1 is a spray nozzle selection guide for broadcast applications. Remember, if you are banding use an even flow nozzle. An example of this nozzle would be AI9504E. The E tells you that this is an even flow nozzle tip which applies the same amount across the entire spray pattern.
Robert Klein
Extension Cropping Systems Specialist
West Central REC
Corn flea beetles may not have overwintered well
|
Corn flea beetles overwinter as adults in protected areas near corn fields. They become active in April and feed on a variety of grasses before corn emerges. Corn flea beetles can directly injure corn by feeding on seedling plants; however, probably more importantly they vector the bacterium which causes Stewart’s wilt. (For more information, see the NebGuide, “Stewart’s Wilt of Corn in Nebraska,” G1462.)
To minimize damage caused by flea beetle feeding:
Scout for corn flea beetles on seedling corn. Postemergence treatment may be warranted on dent corn if 50% of plants show severe flea beetle injury (plants look silvery or whitish, or leaves begin to die), and five or more flea beetles per plant are found. If susceptible inbreds or hybrids are grown, an insecticide may be needed when two to three flea beetles per plant are present and 10% of the plants show severe flea beetle injury.
A variety of foliar insecticides are effective in controlling flea beetles. They include: Lorsban 4E, 2-3 pt/acre; Sevin XLR Plus, 1-2 quarts per acre, Asana XL, 5.8-9.6 fl. oz per 1000 row-feet; Lannate LV 0.75-1.5 pt/acre; Pounce 3.2 EC 4-8 fl. oz per acre; Warrior 2.56-3.84 fl. oz per acre), Mustang Max 2.72-4.0 oz per acre; Baythroid 2 1.6-2.8 oz per acre.
Bob Wright
Extension Entomologist
South Central Ag Laboratory
March brings some precipitation relief, especially in the west
?March brought considerable storminess across much of the nation, with one exceptional storm
dumping tremendous moisture along the front range of the Rocky Mountains. The core area of
5-7 foot snows was 100-150 miles long, centered over Denver. West of there, moisture
decreased rapidly on the windward side of the Rockies; however, this storm weakened as it
headed eastward and many areas within the eastern corn belt failed to receive normal
precipitation in March. (See
30-day precipitation map.
Above normal precipitation was recorded across the western third of the state during the last 30
days (See map.)
Many locations in the southwestern and northwestern Panhandle received over 1.50 inches of
moisture during March. (See map.) The remainder of
the state received 0.25 to 1.50 inches of precipitation. Central and south central Nebraska
recorded the driest conditions with most locations receiving 0.25 to 0.50 inches of moisture.
The mid-April snow storm will provide significant moisture for increased streamflow on the southern branch of the Platte River in Colorado. Preliminary estimates indicate that the snowpack within the basin increased from 75-80% of normal to 95-110% of normal. Because reservoirs in northeast Colorado were nearly empty, most of the runoff probably won’t increase flows on the southern branch of the Platte River in Nebraska. Even with this major event, irrigation restrictions will probably continue in Colorado, since hydrologists indicated that it would take a snowpack of 150% of normal by mid-April to alleviate water restrictions.
Southeast and south central Wyoming received good snowfall, but not to the extent of central Colorado. Most locations received 1-3 feet of snow. This will likely translate into a small boost for runoff into the northern branch of the Platte River. At this time it is unclear whether significant increases will be noticed in Nebraska, since Wyoming reservoirs have tremendous storage space available to capture runoff.
The Climate Assessment Response Committee was to meet April 3 to discuss the reservoir and irrigation picture across the state. In addition the Natural Resource and Conservation Service will issue its final snowpack and streamflow estimates next week. Results and details of the CARC meeting will appear in future editions of CropWatch.
Top soil moisture levels did show significant improvement across western Nebraska. Most soil moisture monitor sites indicated a 1.00-1.50 inch improvement in available moisture during the month of March. It is important to remind readers that these sites are under grass and only provide a relative estimate of moisture that may exists under fields dedicated to grain production.
Soil moisture monitoring sites across the western third of Nebraska indicate 1.50-3.00 inches of available moisture. The central third of the state has 2-4 inches available, while the eastern third has 3-5 inches available. A five-foot profile generally will contain 10 inches of available moisture at field capacity for clay and silty loams, 8 inches for sandy loams, and 6 inches for fine sands.
The large system that traversed the country during the middle of the month originated out of the Gulf of Alaska. This area has been dominated by high pressure for much of the winter and you have to go back to last October to see a similar pattern. It appears that as one upper air low moves southeast into the central Rockies, it is replaced be another upper air low. As long as this pattern continues, we should expect an active weather pattern. However, we need to see this pattern continue through May to sufficiently recharge our dry soils.
It has been particularly dry across the eastern corn belt. Departures since October 1 (See map) are in excess of 6 inches for many areas. In terms of percent of normal (See map), many areas of the eastern Corn Belt have received less than 60% of normal precipitation. During El Nino years the eastern Corn Belt does show a tendency for drier than normal conditions during in fall and spring. It remains to be seen whether this region returns to normal precipitation patterns as we head into the early summer.
The western Corn Belt has fared slightly better than our eastern counterparts in terms of departures (see map). The western Corn Belt normally doesn’t receive as much precipitation as the eastern Corn Belt; however, in terms of percentage of normal, most locations in the western Corn Belt have received 70-110% of normal. The large April snow storm had a considerable contribution to the soil recharge year, as did the abundant precipitation in October.
Continuing to cause concern as we move forward are the significant departures in long-term periods typically associated with hydrological drought. Three-year departures for the High Plains region (see "http://cropwatch.unl.edu/graphics/4403_36mpdepthprcc.png">map) are over 20 inches in many locations. If the Sept. 15, 1999 - March 31, 2000 levels are added to the 36-month departures, many locations would add an additional 4-8 inches to long-term departures. This means that the hydrological issue will not disappear this year and will take an extended time (one to two years) of normal to above normal precipitation to undo the accumulated impacts of this long-term drought. As long as the current pattern continues, expect large temperature fluctuations and the potential for large severe weather outbreaks. This is especially true with near record to record highs being recorded on several occasions in March. I don’t like to see temperatures in the 80s this early in the year because it gives people a false sense of security. The average date of the last 28oF temperature generally falls between April 15 and April 30.
In the near term, it appears that a rather potent system will be impacting the central United States by this weekend, with severe weather expected as far north as central Nebraska. In addition, enough cold air could be drawn into this system to develop snow across the Panhandle and Sandhills. Strong winds will accompany this system, so soil erosion could be a problem. We'll keep an eye on the Gulf of Alaska for the development of another strong system that could impact the central U.S. April 12-18.
Al Dutcher
State Climatologist
What I can report on now is the status of leaf and stripe rusts in Texas. If you remember stripe rust was widespread and damaging in the southern and central plains including Nebraska in 2000 and 2001 and leaf rust was moderately severe in 2002.
The following information is based on the most recent update from the USDA’s Cereal Disease Lab. In mid-February they reported light amounts of leaf rust in central Texas. Cool temperatures restricted leaf rust development, so the situation had not changed by early March.
By mid-February there were several hot spots of stripe rust in central Texas and by early March stripe rust was spreading in that area. When this disease occurred in Nebraska in 2001, the varieties 2137 and Lakin showed the highest rust severities. The northward progression of both rusts will be monitored as our growing season begins. Critical factors that will determine if we will have problems are how rapidly these rusts build up in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas, a pattern of southerly winds that blow rust spores north and our May and early June weather once rust reaches Nebraska.
EPA grants special pesticide registrations for 2003
The Environmental Protection Agency recently granted requests from the Nebraska Department of Agriculture to use the following products in Nebraska for this growing season:
A request also has been filed for the use of Eminent on sugarbeets.
Rich Reiman, administrator of NDA’s Plant Industry Division, reminded producers that they must have a Section 18 label in their possession at the time of use. If applicable, contact the Nebraska Department of Agriculture for a permit to distribute any of these products.
Wheat disease
With wheat just resuming growth in Nebraska, there is little disease activity. Surveys will be conducted later this month and during May to determine which diseases are active and their incidence and severity.
Extension Plant Pathologist
Removal timing critical when grazing wheat
|
The developing grain head on all small grains (winter wheat, rye, triticale, barley) is located just above the highest stem node of the plant. Grain yield is jeopardized when this structure elongates and elevates to a height that is susceptible to being removed by grazing livestock. Generally, this occurs when the growth stage we call ‘jointing’ begins, usually about mid-April (earlier in southern Nebraska and later in the northern counties). Maintaining a 2- to 3-inch minimum stubble helps.
The jointing growth stage is easy to identify. Before jointing, all nodes are small and grouped together at or below the soil surface. Only a ‘pseudo’ stem comprised of tightly wrapped sheaths of leaves gives the plant erect growth. When jointing occurs, the first node becomes swollen and appears above the soil surface. It can be seen or felt. This begins formation of the true stem with the grain spike just above this first node. A sharp knife can split the stem lengthwise to see the location of the hollow (in most varieties) true stem, the hard and swollen node, and an elongated, triangular shaped developing grain spike.
Grazing tends to slightly delay the onset of jointing. Thus, a good way to avoid grain yield reduction is to protect a small area of the field from grazing and observe ungrazed plants for the onset of jointing. If animals then are removed from the small grain pasture, little grain yield reduction will have occurred as a result of grazing removing grain heads. Grazing often can continue for a week to 10 days beyond the onset of jointing with only slight grain yield reduction as long as a minimum of 2 to 3 inches of stubble remains ungrazed. Both irrigated and dryland fields respond similarly.
If the primary grain head is removed, plants sometimes produce new tillers but these new tillers usually do not produce grain.
Spring small grains, like oats, behave similarly. They will not elevate their seed heads until about one month later than winter small grain. Tillers stimulated by early grazing can form some grain.
Bruce Anderson
Extension Forage Specialist
Lenis Nelson
Extension Crop Variety, Seed Production Specialist
David Baltensperger
Extension Crop Breeding Specialist
Panhandle REC
Disadvantages to no-till include relying solely on clipping or post-emergence herbicides for weed control. Fortunately, we have good post-emergence herbicides available. Another problem is ridges from prior row crops that can interfere with uniform seeding as well as make fields rough for future haying operations. And finally, some drills do not work well for no-till seeding so equipment might limit your options.
If you can do it, no-till alfalfa is worth trying. It works really well in bean stubble and almost as well in small grain stubble. No-till is a bit more difficult in corn and milo stubble, especially if there is much row ridging. Be sure to kill any early weeds with Roundup or Gramoxone before planting. And last but not least, use a drill that places seed about one-half inch deep and then covers seed with soil using a good press wheel.
Seed alfalfa no-till to save moisture
With less crop residue from last year in some fields and limited soil moisture this spring, no-till might be a good way to establish alfalfa this year. There are some obvious advantages to seeding alfalfa no-till, like fewer trips across the field and the resulting savings of fuel and time. In addition, retaining crop residues will help reduce soil erosion. No-till also conserves soil moisture, which may be the best reason of all this spring. The lack of tillage also will provide for a firm seedbed and contribute to rapid seedling emergence. Finally, no-till will limit the number of new weed seeds near the soil surface.
Extension Forage Specialist
Proso offers benefits in reduced irrigation areas
Proso millet, Panicum miliaceum (L.), is a warm season grass capable of producing seed 60 to 90 days after planting, while using limited water. It has been called millet, hog millet, and yellow hog. Proso can be used as bird and livestock feed in the United States and for livestock feed and human consumption in other countries. The feed value of proso millet for cattle and swine is generally considered to equal that of grain sorghum or milo and corn (when less than 50% of the corn in the ration is replaced).
|
Proso has a shallow rooting system. Its rooting depth is generally limited to the upper 6 to 12 inches. It is one of the most efficient crops at removing moisture from the topsoil and converting it to dry matter. Proso requires approximately 270 pounds of water to produce 1 pound of dry matter; wheat requires approximately 530 pounds of water to produce 1 pound of dry matter.
For these reasons proso may be a valuable alternative for irrigated land with less than normal available irrigation water. Irrigated yields may be as high as 40 cwt per acre, although yield might more typically range from 30 to 35 cwt per acre. Proso has minimal straw strength relative to wheat so production practices targeting yields higher than this usually result in lodging and significant yield losses. The most serious problem with irrigated proso production is wild proso. Select fields where there is no history of wild proso. Buffalo-bur also can cause the crop to be rejected. Most broadleaves can be controlled, but sandbur can be a serious competitor.
The bulk of proso sold in the cash trade is marketed through elevators in the counties where it is grown most extensively. This grain is cleaned further, processed, and used for bird seed. Both domestic and wild bird seed is packaged by adding other grains for color and nutrition. Some proso goes through a dehulling process and supplies both human and animal needs. Some is exported and some is used for specialty purposes, such as mushroom production. Proso is the only millet of quantity involved in world trade. As a feed grain, some cracking improves utilization.
Proso prices have historically been higher than corn or sorghum, but this varies dramatically from season to season. When the premium human food and bird seed markets are saturated, the price quickly drops to feed grain values or less as conversion from corn to proso can cost some money. Proso prices have ranged from $1.50 to $20 per cwt over a five-year period.
Predictions are always difficult, but proso millet may have a positive fit for the 2003 production year. For more information on proso production practices refer to Producing and Marketing Proso Millet in the High Plains, EC 95-137, available online or at your local NU Cooperative Extension Office.
David Baltensperger
Crop Breeding Specialist
Drew Lyon
Cropping Systems Specialist
Panhandle REC
![]()
![]() |
About Crop Watch |
Agricultural News |
Events |
Archives |
Markets Ag Links | Weather | Photos | Search Lisa Jasa, Crop Watch Editor | Publications | IANR |
| Published by The Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperative Extension, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Cooperating with the counties and the U.S. Department of Agriculture | ||
| University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture. | ||