University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperative Extension


June 7, 2002

In this week's Crop Watch:

Weeds can quickly become a problem in soybeans when they overtop the crop canopy. This week's CropWatch includes several stories on herbicide selection and timing. (Photo by Brett Hampton)
Weed Control
Selecting the right postemergence herbicide for soybeans
Table of postemergence herbicides for soybeans
Row spacing influences weed control timing
Morningglory -- a glyphosate survivor
Insect Control
Stalkborer predictor map
Management
Western Nebraska drought worsens; water allocation restrictions expected
Drought declaration initiates network for aid and information
Management tips
Diseases
Wheat leaf rust and stripe and viruses found in fields
Kansas update on wheat diseases
Fertility
Avoiding crop injury with liquid manure
Alfalfa and Grasses
Fertilizing warm-season grasses
Grazing CRP: Is it the right choice?
Resources
Farm mediation clinics available
Equipment management issues on Market Journal
Updates
Field updates
AgNews
Conservation security program: a welcome addition
New web site helps Nebraskans put farm bill to work
Summer water tour examines North Platte River issues
"Backyard Farmer" web site reaches toward new audiences
Dairy production forecast looks positive for Nebraska
Grape growers field day set for July in Lexington
Country of origin labeling: A first step


Selecting the right postemergence herbicide for soybeans

Management tips
June 7-21

  • Alfalfa regrowth needs to be scouted for potential insect problems such as alfalfa weevil and variegated cutworms. If alfalfa does not begin to green up normally, scout in litter and dirt around the crowns to see if insects are a problem.

  • Now is the time to determine whether bean leaf beetles should be treated to prevent damage to seedling soybeans. Despite what appears to be extensive feeding, most soybean fields do not reach treatable levels in the early part of the growing season. Use economic thresholds to determine whether treatment is necessary. While there is a link between the bean leaf beetle and viruses like the bean pod mottle virus, no specific yield loss relationships have been developed in Nebraska and at this time it is not recommended to spray bean leaf beetles to prevent virus transmission. (See the April 19 CropWatch for further information on early season management of the bean leaf beetle.)

  • The pre-sidedress nitrate test is the best test for determining nitrogen needs in corn after alfalfa or manure applications. Sample the soil 12 inches deep when corn is up to 12 inches tall and have it tested for nitrate-N. Sampling to 24 inches increases the precision of the test. The critical levels noted in the Iowa publication (cited below) are probably valid in Nebraska. In other words, if the soil nitrate levels are in the mid-20s (ppm) than response to additional nitrogen is unlikely. However, we recommend using our standard nitrogen recommendation formula when soil tests are below the critical level. For Nebraska recommendations,see the NU Cooperative Extension publication, "Fertilizer Suggestions For Corn," G174. For further information on using the pre-sidedress nitrate test, check the University of Iowa Cooperative Extension publication, "Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn in Iowa."

  • Visit your irrigated fields to measure soil water content once a week through June 15. Consider twice a week visits after the 10-12 leaf stage of corn or beginning flower in soybeans. The Web version of the Neb-Guide "Estimating Moisture by Appearance and Feel," G84-690, has excellent photos of four soil textures at three moisture contents. For a copy of the original USDA booklet using these photos, call Pat McGrane at the Nebraska Natural Resource Conservation Service in Lincoln, 402-437-5328, or email him at pat.mcgrane@ne.usda.gov

  • Much of the state's soybean crop has been planted and now producers are fine-tuning their summer weed management strategies. For some producers, their weed management choice will be easy because they planted herbicide resistant crops and will likely choose the corresponding herbicide when the time comes. For others, the choice may not be as easy with the many products on the market controlling various weeds at different stages.

    Producers who used a preemergence herbicide this year may have more flexibility in their postemergence weed management strategy. With the preemergence herbicide down, producers will generally be able to wait longer before applying postemergence herbicides or cultivating. Several other strategies include the use of an early postemergence herbicide with residual control such as a Roundup + Pursuit (or Extreme) tank mix, a timely postemergence application followed by cultivation or two separate postemergence applications timed 20-30 days apart, letting the weed growth stage dictate application timing.

    Regardless of which strategy you use, timing of weed removal is critical. (See April 12, 2002, CropWatch for discussion of the importance of keeping soybeans weed free from the 2nd trifoliate to beginning bloom.)

    The weed management you choose should be flexible enough to allow for removal during this critical time. Management strategies will largely be based on the time constraints of individual producers. Picking the strategy that best fits into your schedule will help you maintain optimum weed management.

    Growers should consider several issues when choosing a postemergence herbicide. One such issue is crop safety. Many soybean herbicides utilized for broadleaf control are cell membrane disrupters. Herbicides such as Blazer, Cobra, Resource, and Flexstar will do well on many broadleaf weeds, especially waterhemp, but also will cause some amount of burning on the soybean leaves. Research has shown there is little to no yield impact from this burn in early growth stages of soybeans. Once soybeans begin blooming avoid spraying these cell membrane disrupter herbicides.

    Grass control is not a problem with soybeans because herbicides such as Poast, Fusion, Fusilade, and Select will easily control annual grasses. One slight problem, these grass herbicides require crop oil and when tank mixed with cell membrane disrupters for broadleaf control, things can really heat up. In addition, grass control will generally be slightly reduced when one of these grass products is tank mixed with a broadleaf herbicide.

    Managing problem weed species

    Black nightshade

    This weed is problematic in many soybean stands in mid to late season. Control with Pheonix at 8-12.5 oz/a, UltraBlazer at 1-1.5 pt/a, Reflex/Flexstar at 1 pt/a, Pursuit DG at 1.44 oz, a, Raptor at 5 oz/a, and Roundup UltraMax in RR soybeans at 26 oz/a. Because nightshade moves in late in the season, cell membrane disrupters may not be a feasible treatment, especially during blooming.

    Kochia

    Roundup UltraMax in Roundup Ready soybeans at 26 oz/a. Herbicides offering less control, in the 80% range, include Basagran at 2 pt/a, Pursuit DG at 1.44 oz/a, Raptor at 5 oz/a, and Synchrony in STS soybeans at 0.5 oz/a. Keep in mind that many areas have ALS-resistant kochia meaning herbicides such as Synchrony, Pursuit, and Raptor will not provide control.

    Velvetleaf

    Control of velvetleaf can be achieved with cell membrane disrupters including UltraBlazer at 1-1.5 pt/a, Pheonix at 8-12.5 oz/a, Reflex/Flexstar at 1 pt/a, as well as Basagran at 2 pt/a, Classic at 0.5-0.75 oz/a, Pursuit DG at 1.44 oz/a, Raptor at 5 oz/a, Resource at 4 oz for velvetleaf < 4 inches, Synchrony in STS soybeans at 0.5 oz/a, Roundup UltraMax in RR soybeans at 26 oz/a, and Stellar at 6 oz/a.

    Waterhemp

    Because much of the water-hemp is ALS-resistant, only a handful of herbicides will provide satisfactory control. These include cell membrane disrupters such as UltraBlazer/Status at 1-1.5 pt/a, Pheonix at 10-12 oz/a, Reflex/Flexstar at 1 pt/a, as well as Stellar at 6 oz/a and Roundup UltraMax in Roundup Ready soybeans at 26 oz/a.

    Brady Kappler
    Weed Science Educator

    Table of postemergence herbicides for soybeans


    Row spacing influences weed control timing

    With the advances of herbicide tolerant soybean (eg. Roundup-Ready) there is still a constant dilemma on how to "time" post-emergence weed control. To decide whether weed control is economically worthwhile, it's necessary to understand whether a given weed infestation is likely to reduce yield if left uncontrolled.

    The critical period of weed control (CPWC) is a period in the crop growth cycle when weeds must be controlled to prevent yield losses. Weeds that emerge before or after this period may not present a threat to crop yields. This information is essential in making decisions on the need for and timing of weed control and in achieving an efficient use of herbicides. Research at the University of Nebraska has shown that each crop has a critical period of weed control; the length of which is influenced by cropping practices. In soybeans, for example, row spacing would influence the length of the period.

    Effect of row spacing on CPWC

    Studies were conducted in 1999 at Mead and in 2000 at Mead and Concord. Predominant weed species at both locations/years were velvetleaf, common waterhemp and green foxtail, with the densities ranging from 70-100 plants per square yard.

    Table 1: The beginning of CPWC in soybean based on 5% yield loss expressed as crop leaf stage (eg. V1) and days after crop emergence (DAE) as affected by the row spacing, at two locations in 1999 and 2000.
    Row spacing
    Time to control weeds
    Time to control weeds
    inches
    Soybean leaf stage
    Days after crop emergence

    7.5
    V3
    19
    15
    V2
    15
    30
    V1
    9
    The critical time of weed removal was significantly influenced by row spacing. Generally, an increase in row spacing resulted in a need for earlier weed removal, thus a less competitive crop. For example, beginning of the CPWC in the wide-row soybean (30-inch) was approximately at the 1rd trifoliate stage, based on a 5% acceptable yield loss level (Table 1). This suggests that in the wide-row soybeans the control measure should start early in the season (at the 1st trifoliate stage). In 15-inch rows, the critical period of weed control is delayed and egins with the second trifoliate stage. Not surprisingly, with 7.5-inch rows, the beginning of the CPWC is delayed even further to the 3rd trifoliate stage (Table 1).

    This data implies that reducing row spacing delayed the timing of weed control and increased the tolerance of soybean to weed presence. The mechanism of soybean tolerance needs to be determined yet, although we believe it is related to the crop shading effects. The speculation is that even though the weeds are present in the narrow row soybeans they are not growing as vigorously and they are not as competitive against the crop, due to crop shading effects. From a practical standpoint, these results indicate that reducing soybean row spacing increases soybean tolerance to weeds and may require less intensive weed management programs (eg. weed control measure applied perhaps once or twice).

    Cost of delaying weed control

    The commonly asked question among producers is "How much is it going to cost me if I delay weed control?" Possible reasons for delayed weed control may include weather constrains (rainfall, wind), and time constrains due to large acreage to spray. In order to answer the above question the yield loss data from the above studies were pooled among years-locations and graphed against the crop growth stage at the time of weed removal in corn and soybean (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. Soybean yield loss and beginning of CPWC as influenced by the timing of weed removal and row spacing.
    The 2% yield loss per every leaf stage of delay passed the critical stage of weed control, was determined as the cost of delaying weed control in soybean. For example, the time to control weeds in 7.5 inch rows soybean is the V3 stage (third trifoliate-Table 1), if weed control is delayed to the V4 (fourth trifoliate), it will cost a producer about 2% in yield losses due to prolonged competition from weeds. The same is true if weed control is delayed past the recommended critical time in other soybean row spacings (Figure 1). This recommendation is applicable up to the R3 stage in soybean (beginning pod). If the weed control is delayed further than these indicated stages the yield losses will be much higher than suggested. In terms of actual economic losses in soybean, it will be about $5 per acre for every soybean leaf stage of delay, assuming a price of $5 bushel and a yield goal of 40 bushels.

    Weed size

    Weed size at the time of control is another issue. If the weeds emerge four to five days before the crop or if they are taller than the crop, they will shade the crop. In these cases control should begin four to five days (one to two leaves) prior to the beginning of CPWC. If the weeds emerge 5-10 days after the crop, they will not shade the crop that early in the season so the control can be initiated 5-10 days (two to three leaves) after the beginning of critical period.

    The size of weed species also will affect the herbicide use rates, especially the rates of Roundup in Roundup-Ready soybeans. It is generally known that Roundup has better activity on grassy rather than broadleaf species. The rates of 16-24 ounces should provide control of most common annual grassy species (foxtails, barnyardgrass, field sandbur, woolly cupgrass, panicums) that are 3-8 inches tall. The same rates should control annual broadleaves (velvetleaf, lambs-quarters, pigweeds, mustards) less than 6 inches tall. For taller grasses and broadleaf species, a full rate (32 oz) will be required. Higher rates of Roundup (40-60 ounces) will be needed to control species such as ivy-leaf morning-glory, sweet clover, field bindweed, Venice mellow and various smartweed species (lady's thumb, Pennsylvania smartweed, wild buckwheat, etc).

    Practical use of the CPWC in herbicide tolerant crops

    The concept of critical period of weed control is an important part of integrated weed management of herbicide-tolerant crops, such as the popular Roundup Ready soybeans and can help answer the fundamental questions of "if" and "when to apply post-emergence herbicide. A generally sound strategy in Roundup-Ready soybeans would be to apply Roundup tank-mixed with a residual herbicide at the beginning of the critical period. This would provide adequate weed throughout the period when weed control is critical to maintaining yields. To select appropriate herbicide mixtures for the weed spectrum at your farm, consult the herbicide efficacy tables from the NU Cooperative Extension publication, Guide for Weed Management in Nebraska (EC-130)

    Stevan Knezevic
    Extension Weeds Specialist
    Haskell Ag Lab, Concord


    Morningglory -- a glyphosate survivor

    Since Roundup Ready crops were introduced in 1996, the use of Roundup and other brands of glyphosate has increased rapidly. This is generally due to product efficacy, cost effectiveness and ease of implementation. The picture could change, however, if producers rely on a single in-crop application of glyphosate so much that there is a natural shift toward weed species not readily controlled by glyphosate. Emergence patterns and herbicide tolerance are characteristics that may allow particular weeds to survive and produce seed under the glyphosate system. Using the herbicide properly and incorporating other weed management practices into the system can help limit this and help maintain the long-term utility of glyphosate.

    Figure 1. Emergence of morningglory over time in relation to glyphosate application timing. (Click on image to see full-size graph.)
    Morningglory is an example of a weed that may use these mechanisms and go on to survive and flourish under the glyphosate system. Morningglory is more tolerant to glyphosate than many weeds with less than 70% control when it is treated at a height of 6 inches. Morningglory's extended emergence period also is a factor in its survival under glyphosate (Figure 1).

    To learn more about the factors affecting this the University of Nebraska conducted a study to evaluate the survival mechanisms and success of weeds in the Roundup Ready soybean and glyphosate system The three application timings tested consisted of a single treatment 20 to 25 days after planting (DAP), a single late treatment at 30 to 35 DAP, and sequential glyphosate applications at 20 to 25 DAP and 45 to 50 DAP. Increases in morningglory seedbank size were observed under all treatments, with the greatest increase observed under the single late application. The single early treatment provided good control of the weeds present and prevented early season competition with the crop; however, morningglory continued to emerge after the treatment (Figure 1), resulting in seed production. The single late treatment stunted the large morningglory plants, but many of them recovered and produced seed. The sequential glyphosate treatments resulted in the best morningglory management. The early application of the sequential treatment reduced early season competition and controlled the emerged morningglory. The second application was made after most of the morningglory had emerged and controlled most of the plants that emerged after the first application (Figure 1).

    Recommendations

    In order to maintain the long-term value of glyphosate as a weed control tool and to reduce weed species shifts, it is important to use integrated weed management (IWM) practices. It is essential to be aware of the species infesting your fields and to match the treatment timing to those species.

    To successfully manage weeds on a long-term basis, it's important to have an understanding of the biology of the weeds present and to be able to implement an integrated weed management strategy.

    Kari L. Hilgenfeld
    Former Graduate Research Assistant

    Alex R. Martin
    Extension Weeds Specialist
    NU Department of Agronomy and Horticulture


    Wheat leaf rust and stripe
    and viruses found in fields

    Both leaf rust and stripe rust were observed in Lincoln the last week of May. Severities were light and the rusts were present only on leaves below the flag and flag-1. Hot weather that week should have slowed the development of stripe rust, so that disease probably will not be as major a factor as it was in 2001.

    Leaf rust could continue to develop in the next three to four weeks if we get frequent thunderstorms and southerly winds. It probably won't significantly reduce yields, since most of the wheat in southeast and south central Nebraska is flowering. Leaf rust would need to develop very rapidly these next few weeks to reach high enough severities to damage the crop.

    Viruses continue to be the most evident diseases. Symptoms of soil-borne wheat mosaic are still present. The hot weather slows soil-borne mosaic but accentuates symptom development of wheat streak mosaic. Recently, the plant disease clinic received three wheat samples with wheat streak mosaic from southeast and south central Nebraska. One sample from southeast Nebraska tested positive for both soil-borne mosaic and wheat streak mosaic. Symptoms were severe enough that yield will be significantly reduced. I have also observed symptoms of barley yellow dwarf in the field.

    John E. Watkins
    Extension Plant Pathologist


    Wheat disease update from Kansas

    Tan spot, barley yellow dwarf, and leaf rust were common diseases to wheat in central and southeast Kansas in late May. In some fields, foliar disease severity was high and all leaves were lost to disease. Root rot diseases such as take all and dryland root rot and head diseases like scab and bunt are expected to become evident as the wheat begins to mature.

    Foliar diseases have increased significantly due to earlier rainfall. Tan spot and leaf rust were common. In southeast Kansas disease pressure was significantly higher than in central Kansas. The wheat was more advanced in maturity and all fields were at the soft dough stage and waiting only on some sunshine and wind to mature. Tan spot was perhaps the most common and the most severe, although it varied from field to field. Leaf rust was high on about one of ten fields and had severities ranging from 5% to 25%. Some stripe rust was occasionally noted in fields at about 5% severity.

    Outside of Kansas, Karnal bunt appears to be at low levels as compared to last year in Texas and Arizona. Custom cutters were reported to be avoiding fields even near those where samples had tested positive to avoid spreading the disease.

    Jon A. Appel
    Kansas Department of Agriculture


    Drought declaration initiates
    network for aid and information

    Grazing CRP acres:
    Is it the right choice?

    Many drought stressed counties recently received permission to graze CRP acres to help relieve some of the grazing shortage due to the prolonged drought.

    However, grazing CRP is not the panacea many people might think. After all, a portion of your CRP payment must be forfeited. In addition, fresh growth of CRP grass this year has been stunted by the drought and there may be a lot of dead plant material remaining from previous years. Given these factors, the CRP acres may not provide the kind of nutrition your cows and calves need. In addition, these areas may lack adequate fences or water.

    Think about what it is going to cost you to graze that CRP and be sure to include poor calf gains in your figures if you plan to graze pairs on CRP that contains more old dead growth than good, green feed. Cows won't milk as well and calves can't just pick the good grass out of the old growth.

    Maybe the best way to graze CRP is to first wean the calves. Then, once your cows are bred, they can rough it through the summer on low quality CRP forage if they don't need to produce milk to support their calf.

    Before you commit to grazing CRP, be sure it's the best choice for your operation. Bruce Anderson
    Extension Forage Specialist

    Governor Mike Johanns has declared a drought emergency in Nebraska, opening the door to state and national funding and program assistance for drought stricken areas. The Drought Monitor, released by the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, indicates most of western Nebraska is experiencing moderate to extreme drought conditions.

    The governor's declaration provides for:

    The emergency declaration authorizes the use of the Governor's Emergency Fund to help local jurisdictions with emergency needs related to the drought.

    Federal assistance

    Sixteen counties have been named primary disaster areas due to drought, unseasonably cold spring temperatures, high winds and frost. They are Banner, Chase, Cheyenne, Custer, Dawson, Deuel, Dundy, Frontier, Hayes, Hitchcock, Keith, Kimball, Perkins, Red Willow, Scotts Bluff, and Sioux.

    In addition, seven counties are eligible for assistance because they are contiguous to the primary disaster areas. They are Arthur, Blaine, Box Butte, Buffalo, Dawes, Furnas, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Lincoln, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Morrill, Phelps, Sherman, and Valley.

    Federal low-interest loans are the primary resources being made available to residents in these counties.

    Twelve counties have been released for Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) emergency grazing: Arthur, Banner, Chase, Cheyenne, Deuel, Garden, Hayes, Keith, Kimball, Perkins, Scotts Bluff, and Sioux.


    Western Nebraska drought worsens; water allocation restrictions expected

    The Climate Assessment Response Committee (CARC) met in late May to hear reports of how the drought situation was developing across Nebraska, particularly in western Nebraska. Following are excerpts from some of the reports.

    Climate report

    Drought conditions are being experienced throughout the Rocky Mountains from Mexico to Canada. The worst hit areas appear to be from Mexico to south central Wyoming where most areas are experiencing severe or extreme drought. North central Montana is the only area of the country experiencing exceptional drought conditions, the highest classification on the U.S. Drought Monitor scale. This area has experienced almost five years of drought.

    Precipitation across Nebraska during the 60 days prior to May 19 was less than 20% of normal in the southern Panhandle and southwest Nebraska. A broad area of 20-40% of normal precipitation extends eastward through the Sandhills to Broken Bow and south to Kansas. Much of the rest of the state has had precipitation at 40-80%of normal.

    Since September periodic wet periods with heavy rainfall have kept the eastern fourth of the state generally within normal ranges; however, most of central, north central, south central, and north central Nebraska have received less than 80% of normal precipitation for the period, further intensifying drought conditions. Southwestern Nebraska has near normal numbers for the period, however, that may be somewhat misleading since most of the precipitation fell last fall.

    Snowpack/streamflow/reservoirs

    Seasonal snowfall within areas of the Rockies feeding the Platte River System were abysmal. Snowpack estimates are 20%-50% of the historical normals and less than 80% of last year's snowpack. Snowpack elevations are above 10,000 feet and won't likely provide moisture until mid-June. As a result, inflow rates into Lake McConaughy were running about 300 cubic feet per second (cfs) as of May 21. This compares to 1,000 cfs for the same date last year. Streamflow rates entering Swanson Lake appear to have been at historical lows for May and set historical lows in March and April. Every river gauge on the Republican River in Nebraska is either setting daily historical lows or is within the lowest 10% of flow rates ever measured. This has been consistent through 2002.

    Hay Hotline links buyers and sellers

    The Nebraska Hay Hotline was activated in May and now has almost 90 sellers registered. Producers who have hay, alfalfa, or other types of forage to sell or donate may call the hotline to be included in a database of available suppliers. Pastures also will be included in the database, which is updated daily. The list is available by calling the hotline at 800-422-6692 or accessing the
    web site.

    "I have received some reports that producers are selling down cattle herds because of increasing forage concerns," said Meryln Carlson, director of the Nebraska Department of Agriculture, in a news release announcing the hotline. "Hopefully farmers and ranchers will be able to find available forage close to their homes by placing a call to this hotline."

    According to a report by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, Nebraska hay stocks, as of May 1, 2002, were 1,280,000 tons, more than double the stocks available on May 1, 2001, following the drought of 2000.

    "If the situation continues to decline like it did in 2000, the available stocks may be used quickly," Carlson said.

    In late May Lake McConaughy near Ogallala was at 65% of capacity. That's 92% of last year's level on the same date and 78% of the 2000 level. Projections for this summer indicate inflows into the lake will be at 30% of the historical normal. Only three years have seen lower inflow rates at this point in time: 1956, 1963, and 1992.

    Lake levels for Hugh Butler, Swanson, and Enders continue to be disappointing. As of May 21, Swanson Reservoir contained only 57% of its normal pool, Swanson stood at 29%, and Enders came in at 35%. Harlan County Reservoir has had record low inflows since March.

    Irrigation restrictions

    As of May 20, users in the Central Nebraska Public Power District or Nebraska Public Power District are not expected to be restricted. State Line Canals expects to deliver less than 15 inches, compared to a normal supply of 18 inches. No restrictions are forecasted for delivery systems originating from the Loup River. The Ainsworth Irrigation District anticipates full allocations this summer.

    Restrictions are projected for several districts. The affected districts, the normal water supply and the expected supply (in inches) are: Nebraska Bostwick (12, 11); Cambridge Canal (12, 9); Bartley Canal (12, 6); Red Willow Canal (12, 6); Meeker-Driftwood Canal (12, 6). The H&RW Irrigation district does not now expect to be able to deliver water this season, and the Frenchman Valley Irrigation district expects to deliver just 4 inches. No normal delivery quantities were given for these two systems.

    Projections for surface water availability can now be accessed at the CARC Web site. As the summer progresses, CARC plans to provide more information on this important issue in audio reports.

    Miscellaneous reports

    Craig Head from the Nebraska Farm Bureau presented field reports from the Nebraska Panhandle. The consensus of the reports was that hay prices were rising dramatically, soils were exceptionally dry, and pastures and wheat were suffering. The next CARC meeting is June 20.

    Al Dutcher
    State Meteorologist


    Fertilizing warm-season grasses

    With the recent hot weather it's a good time to apply nitrogen to warm-season grasses. These grasses will begin growing rapidly as soil and air temperature increase and adding nitrogen now will help these grasses produce extra hay.

    How much to apply depends on your situation. Will you actually use the extra grass to graze more cattle or increase hay yields? It's surprising how often fertilizer is applied and the extra growth is wasted by poor grazing management. Unless you economically harvest extra growth as hay or with livestock, do not fertilize.

    Also consider the ability of your warm-season grass to yield more. Taller warm-season grasses like big bluestem, switchgrass, and indiangrass will respond to nitrogen better than shorter grasses like little bluestem, sideoats grama, or blue grama.

    In considering how much to apply, remember to adjust nitrogen for moisture conditions. In eastern Nebraska, 50 to 60 pounds of nitrogen per acre works well when rain and soil moisture is high, but during drought it may be advisable to skip fertilizing altogether. In western Nebraska only subirrigated meadows have enough growth potential to respond to added nitrogen; there about 40 pounds per acre will do.

    Bruce Anderson
    Extension Forage Specialist


    Avoiding crop injury with liquid manure
    and sprinkler irrigation systems

    Applying liquid manure or lagoon effluent through a sprinkler irrigation system offers several benefits including being able to apply nutrients when the crop most needs them and when the potential for runoff is low. However, the soluble salts in liquid manure can cause leaf burn and crop injury. Testing liquid manure for salts can help you determine application timing and procedures to reduce the potential for plant damage.

    Soluble salts in manure consist of positively (ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium) and negatively (bicarbonate, chloride, sulfate and nitrate) charged ions. Soluble salt concentration can be estimated using electrical conductivity (EC) in millimho per cm (mmho/cm) or decisiemens per meter (dS/m); mmho/cm = (S/m). The soluble salt concentration (in parts per million) can be estimated as 640 * mmho/cm.

    Electrical conductivity as a measure of ammonium

    Electrical conductivity is used to estimate the salt content of manure. As ammonium is generally the main ion in liquid manure, EC can be used to estimate ammonium-N concentration. If manure is less than 1% dry matter content, or if EC of manure is between 0 and 6 mmho/cm, ammonium-N concentration can be estimated as:

    NH4-N (ppm) = -9 + 77 * EC.

    Liquid manure is considered safe for application to a growing crop when the EC is less than 3 mmho/cm, although manure with an EC greater than 5 has been applied without leaf burn. The thresholds for injury are not well established and vary with crop and growth stage. Corn and wheat are less susceptible to leaf burn than legumes and corn taller than 18 inches is less susceptible than younger corn.

    When the electrical conductivity of manure effluent is greater than 3, effluent can be diluted with fresh water to reduce the salt effect if appropriate check valves (required by law) are used to prevent contamination of the fresh water source.

    When diluting manure through the irrigation system, begin pumping fresh water first and then add the effluent to avoid applying effluent at full concentration.

    Wind, high air temperature and/or low humidity may increase potential leaf burn. Leaf burn is less likely if liquid manure is sprinkler applied in the evening or at night, however night application may contribute to increased odors since odors do not disperse as quickly as during the morning and early afternoon hours.

    Soluble salt content can be determined by having liquid manure samples analyzed by a laboratory. Producers also can take their own electrical conductivity measurements with pocket meters that are available for about $75.

    In summary:

    1. Test the electrical conductivity of liquid manure or effluent before applying through a sprinkler system to a growing crop.
    2. If the electrical conductivity is greater than 3 mmho/cm, take one or more of these precautions.
      • Dilute with fresh water.
      • Apply at night.
      • Apply when corn is over 18 inches tall.
      • Apply to cereal crops.
      • Apply to a small area and wait a few days to see if leaf burn occurs.
    Charles Shapiro
    Soil Fertility Extension Specialist
    Haskell Ag Lab, Northeast REC

    Charles Wortmann
    Soil Fertility Extension Specialist


    Stalk borer predictor

    Accumulated degree days through June 2, using a 41°F base. Egg hatch usually is completed by 750 degree days (DD). Producers should begin scouting for common stalk borers when 1,300-1,400 DD have accumulated and make insecticide treatments at 1400-1700 DD. (Map courtesy Al Dutcher, NU State Climatologist)

    Equipment management strategies to be discussed

    Farm equipment replacement strategies will be featured on the June 13 edition of "Market Journal."

    Guests on the Extension broadcast include Paul Jasa, NU extension engineer, and Mark Schroeder, director of farm operations at NU's Agricultural Research and Development Center at Ithaca. The program is hosted by Doug Jose, UNL ag economist and farm management specialist. Managing machinery costs is a challenge for almost every farmer, Jasa said, but every farmer looks at the challenge from a slightly different perspective.

    "Some like nuts and bolts and like making repairs. They'll run a piece of equipment a lot longer than others," Jasa said. "Other producers buy a new piece of equipment any time their neighbor does."

    ?Knowing when to buy and what to buy is also important. NU's Mark Schroeder runs his full-size equipment until it reaches a point of maximum efficiency based on cost per acre - usually 500 to 800 hours for a combine and 1000 hours or less for a tractor. Schroeder then looks for a dealer program and sells.

    “I try to wait until demand is high for good, late-model equipment,” said Schroeder. “You’ll get a higher price for something that can be turned around and sold real quickly.”

    Jasa and Schroeder will talk about the logic of buying versus leasing, equipment integration, maintenance strategies, the importance of anticipating costs and the changes brought by new technologies.

    The show will be broadcast live via satellite from 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. Thursday, June 13. All programs are archived at the Market Journal Web site.


    Farm mediation clinics available

    The farm mediation program sponsored by the Nebraska Department of Agriculture conducts farm mediation clinics at locations throughout Nebraska. The remaining June clinics are: June 11 in North Platte and June 18 in Lexington.

    The clinics offer individual and confidential information and education on farm finances, the laws, regulations and policies governing Farm Services Agency (FSA); debt restructuring and other legal options; and how the mediation program can help work with lenders to find an agreeable and workable solution. To make an appointment and learn specific clinic locations contact the Farm Hotline at 800-464-0258.


    Field updates

    Producers were able to get into their fields this week in eastern Nebraska to take their first cutting of alfalfa. (Photo by Brett Hampton)

    About Crop Watch | Agricultural News Events | Archives | Markets | Research Ag Links | Weather | Photos Search | Editor Rural Routes | Publications | IANR

    Copyright 2002 by the University of Nebraska
    Published by University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperating with the counties and the U.S. Department of Agriculture
    University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture.