June 7, 2002
|
Weed Control
Insect Control
Management
Diseases
Fertility
Alfalfa and Grasses
Resources
Updates
AgNews![]()
Producers who used a preemergence herbicide this year may have more flexibility in their postemergence weed management strategy. With the preemergence herbicide down, producers will generally be able to wait longer before applying postemergence herbicides or cultivating. Several other strategies include the use of an early postemergence herbicide with residual control such as a Roundup + Pursuit (or Extreme) tank mix, a timely postemergence application followed by cultivation or two separate postemergence applications timed 20-30 days apart, letting the weed growth stage dictate application timing.
Regardless of which strategy you use, timing of weed removal is critical. (See April 12, 2002, CropWatch for discussion of the importance of keeping soybeans weed free from the 2nd trifoliate to beginning bloom.)
The weed management you choose should be flexible enough to allow for removal during this critical time. Management strategies will largely be based on the time constraints of individual producers. Picking the strategy that best fits into your schedule will help you maintain optimum weed management.
Growers should consider several issues when choosing a postemergence herbicide. One such issue is crop safety. Many soybean herbicides utilized for broadleaf control are cell membrane disrupters. Herbicides such as Blazer, Cobra, Resource, and Flexstar will do well on many broadleaf weeds, especially waterhemp, but also will cause some amount of burning on the soybean leaves. Research has shown there is little to no yield impact from this burn in early growth stages of soybeans. Once soybeans begin blooming avoid spraying these cell membrane disrupter herbicides.
Grass control is not a problem with soybeans because herbicides such as Poast, Fusion, Fusilade, and Select will easily control annual grasses. One slight problem, these grass herbicides require crop oil and when tank mixed with cell membrane disrupters for broadleaf control, things can really heat up. In addition, grass control will generally be slightly reduced when one of these grass products is tank mixed with a broadleaf herbicide.
This weed is problematic in many soybean stands in mid to late season. Control with Pheonix at 8-12.5 oz/a, UltraBlazer at 1-1.5 pt/a, Reflex/Flexstar at 1 pt/a, Pursuit DG at 1.44 oz, a, Raptor at 5 oz/a, and Roundup UltraMax in RR soybeans at 26 oz/a. Because nightshade moves in late in the season, cell membrane disrupters may not be a feasible treatment, especially during blooming.
Kochia
Roundup UltraMax in Roundup Ready soybeans at 26 oz/a. Herbicides offering less control, in the 80% range, include Basagran at 2 pt/a, Pursuit DG at 1.44 oz/a, Raptor at 5 oz/a, and Synchrony in STS soybeans at 0.5 oz/a. Keep in mind that many areas have ALS-resistant kochia meaning herbicides such as Synchrony, Pursuit, and Raptor will not provide control.
Velvetleaf
Control of velvetleaf can be achieved with cell membrane disrupters including UltraBlazer at 1-1.5 pt/a, Pheonix at 8-12.5 oz/a, Reflex/Flexstar at 1 pt/a, as well as Basagran at 2 pt/a, Classic at 0.5-0.75 oz/a, Pursuit DG at 1.44 oz/a, Raptor at 5 oz/a, Resource at 4 oz for velvetleaf < 4 inches, Synchrony in STS soybeans at 0.5 oz/a, Roundup UltraMax in RR soybeans at 26 oz/a, and Stellar at 6 oz/a.
Waterhemp
Because much of the water-hemp is ALS-resistant, only a handful of herbicides will provide satisfactory control. These include cell membrane disrupters such as UltraBlazer/Status at 1-1.5 pt/a, Pheonix at 10-12 oz/a, Reflex/Flexstar at 1 pt/a, as well as Stellar at 6 oz/a and Roundup UltraMax in Roundup Ready soybeans at 26 oz/a.
Brady Kappler
Weed Science Educator
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This data implies that reducing row spacing delayed the timing of weed control and increased the tolerance of soybean to weed presence. The mechanism of soybean tolerance needs to be determined yet, although we believe it is related to the crop shading effects. The speculation is that even though the weeds are present in the narrow row soybeans they are not growing as vigorously and they are not as competitive against the crop, due to crop shading effects. From a practical standpoint, these results indicate that reducing soybean row spacing increases soybean tolerance to weeds and may require less intensive weed management programs (eg. weed control measure applied perhaps once or twice).
Cost of delaying weed control
The commonly asked question among producers is "How much is it going to cost me if I delay weed control?" Possible reasons for delayed weed control may include weather constrains (rainfall, wind), and time constrains due to large acreage to spray. In order to answer the above question the yield loss data from the above studies were pooled among years-locations and graphed against the crop growth stage at the time of weed removal in corn and soybean (Figure 1).
|
Weed size
Weed size at the time of control is another issue. If the weeds emerge four to five days before the crop or if they are taller than the crop, they will shade the crop. In these cases control should begin four to five days (one to two leaves) prior to the beginning of CPWC. If the weeds emerge 5-10 days after the crop, they will not shade the crop that early in the season so the control can be initiated 5-10 days (two to three leaves) after the beginning of critical period.
The size of weed species also will affect the herbicide use rates, especially the rates of Roundup in Roundup-Ready soybeans. It is generally known that Roundup has better activity on grassy rather than broadleaf species. The rates of 16-24 ounces should provide control of most common annual grassy species (foxtails, barnyardgrass, field sandbur, woolly cupgrass, panicums) that are 3-8 inches tall. The same rates should control annual broadleaves (velvetleaf, lambs-quarters, pigweeds, mustards) less than 6 inches tall. For taller grasses and broadleaf species, a full rate (32 oz) will be required. Higher rates of Roundup (40-60 ounces) will be needed to control species such as ivy-leaf morning-glory, sweet clover, field bindweed, Venice mellow and various smartweed species (lady's thumb, Pennsylvania smartweed, wild buckwheat, etc).
Practical use of the CPWC in herbicide tolerant crops
The concept of critical period of weed control is an important part of integrated weed management of herbicide-tolerant crops, such as the popular Roundup Ready soybeans and can help answer the fundamental questions of "if" and "when to apply post-emergence herbicide. A generally sound strategy in Roundup-Ready soybeans would be to apply Roundup tank-mixed with a residual herbicide at the beginning of the critical period. This would provide adequate weed throughout the period when weed control is critical to maintaining yields. To select appropriate herbicide mixtures for the weed spectrum at your farm, consult the herbicide efficacy tables from the NU Cooperative Extension publication, Guide for Weed Management in Nebraska (EC-130)
Stevan Knezevic
Extension Weeds Specialist
Haskell Ag Lab, Concord
|
To learn more about the factors affecting this the University of Nebraska conducted a study to evaluate the survival mechanisms and success of weeds in the Roundup Ready soybean and glyphosate system The three application timings tested consisted of a single treatment 20 to 25 days after planting (DAP), a single late treatment at 30 to 35 DAP, and sequential glyphosate applications at 20 to 25 DAP and 45 to 50 DAP. Increases in morningglory seedbank size were observed under all treatments, with the greatest increase observed under the single late application. The single early treatment provided good control of the weeds present and prevented early season competition with the crop; however, morningglory continued to emerge after the treatment (Figure 1), resulting in seed production. The single late treatment stunted the large morningglory plants, but many of them recovered and produced seed. The sequential glyphosate treatments resulted in the best morningglory management. The early application of the sequential treatment reduced early season competition and controlled the emerged morningglory. The second application was made after most of the morningglory had emerged and controlled most of the plants that emerged after the first application (Figure 1).
Recommendations
In order to maintain the long-term value of glyphosate as a weed control tool and to reduce weed species shifts, it is important to use integrated weed management (IWM) practices. It is essential to be aware of the species infesting your fields and to match the treatment timing to those species.
Kari L. Hilgenfeld
Former Graduate Research Assistant
Alex R. Martin
Extension Weeds Specialist
NU Department of Agronomy and Horticulture
Leaf rust could continue to develop in the next three to four weeks if we get frequent
thunderstorms and southerly winds. It probably won't significantly reduce yields, since most of
the wheat in southeast and south central Nebraska is flowering. Leaf rust would need to develop
very rapidly these next few weeks to reach high enough severities to damage the crop.
Viruses continue to be the most evident diseases. Symptoms of soil-borne wheat mosaic are still
present. The hot weather slows soil-borne mosaic but accentuates symptom development of
wheat streak mosaic. Recently, the plant disease clinic received three wheat samples with wheat
streak mosaic from southeast and south central Nebraska. One sample from southeast Nebraska
tested positive for both soil-borne mosaic and wheat streak mosaic. Symptoms were severe
enough that yield will be significantly reduced. I have also observed symptoms of barley yellow
dwarf in the field.
John E. Watkins
Foliar diseases have increased significantly due to earlier rainfall. Tan spot and leaf rust were
common. In southeast Kansas disease pressure was significantly higher than in central Kansas.
The wheat was more advanced in maturity and all fields were at the soft dough stage and waiting
only on some sunshine and wind to mature. Tan spot was perhaps the most common and the
most severe, although it varied from field to field. Leaf rust was high on about one of ten fields
and had severities ranging from 5% to 25%. Some stripe rust was occasionally noted in fields at
about 5% severity.
Outside of Kansas, Karnal bunt appears to be at low levels as compared to last year in Texas and
Arizona. Custom cutters were reported to be avoiding fields even near those where samples had
tested positive to avoid spreading the disease.
Jon A. Appel
Wheat leaf rust and stripe
Both leaf rust and stripe rust were observed in Lincoln the last week of May. Severities were
light and the rusts were present only on leaves below the flag and flag-1. Hot weather that week
should have slowed the development of stripe rust, so that disease probably will not be as major a
factor as it was in 2001.
and viruses found in fields
Extension Plant Pathologist
Wheat disease
update from Kansas
Tan spot, barley yellow dwarf, and leaf rust were common diseases to wheat in central and
southeast Kansas in late May. In some fields, foliar disease severity was high and all leaves were
lost to disease. Root rot diseases such as take all and dryland root rot and head diseases like scab
and bunt are expected to become evident as the wheat begins to mature.
Kansas Department of Agriculture
Drought declaration initiates
network for aid and information
|
The governor's declaration provides for:
Federal assistance
Sixteen counties have been named primary disaster areas due to drought, unseasonably cold spring temperatures, high winds and frost. They are Banner, Chase, Cheyenne, Custer, Dawson, Deuel, Dundy, Frontier, Hayes, Hitchcock, Keith, Kimball, Perkins, Red Willow, Scotts Bluff, and Sioux.
In addition, seven counties are eligible for assistance because they are contiguous to the primary disaster areas. They are Arthur, Blaine, Box Butte, Buffalo, Dawes, Furnas, Garden, Garfield, Gosper, Lincoln, Logan, Loup, McPherson, Morrill, Phelps, Sherman, and Valley.
Federal low-interest loans are the primary resources being made available to residents in these counties.
Twelve counties have been released for Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) emergency grazing: Arthur, Banner, Chase, Cheyenne, Deuel, Garden, Hayes, Keith, Kimball, Perkins, Scotts Bluff, and Sioux.
|
In late May Lake McConaughy near Ogallala was at 65% of capacity. That's 92% of last year's level on the same date and 78% of the 2000 level. Projections for this summer indicate inflows into the lake will be at 30% of the historical normal. Only three years have seen lower inflow rates at this point in time: 1956, 1963, and 1992.
Lake levels for Hugh Butler, Swanson, and Enders continue to be disappointing. As of May 21, Swanson Reservoir contained only 57% of its normal pool, Swanson stood at 29%, and Enders came in at 35%. Harlan County Reservoir has had record low inflows since March.
Irrigation restrictions
As of May 20, users in the Central Nebraska Public Power District or Nebraska Public Power District are not expected to be restricted. State Line Canals expects to deliver less than 15 inches, compared to a normal supply of 18 inches. No restrictions are forecasted for delivery systems originating from the Loup River. The Ainsworth Irrigation District anticipates full allocations this summer.
Restrictions are projected for several districts. The affected districts, the normal water supply and the expected supply (in inches) are: Nebraska Bostwick (12, 11); Cambridge Canal (12, 9); Bartley Canal (12, 6); Red Willow Canal (12, 6); Meeker-Driftwood Canal (12, 6). The H&RW Irrigation district does not now expect to be able to deliver water this season, and the Frenchman Valley Irrigation district expects to deliver just 4 inches. No normal delivery quantities were given for these two systems.
Projections for surface water availability can now be accessed at the CARC Web site. As the summer progresses, CARC plans to provide more information on this important issue in audio reports.
Miscellaneous reports
Craig Head from the Nebraska Farm Bureau presented field reports from the Nebraska Panhandle. The consensus of the reports was that hay prices were rising dramatically, soils were exceptionally dry, and pastures and wheat were suffering. The next CARC meeting is June 20.
Al Dutcher
State Meteorologist
How much to apply depends on your situation. Will you actually use the extra grass to graze
more cattle or increase hay yields? It's surprising how often fertilizer is applied and the extra
growth is wasted by poor grazing management. Unless you economically harvest extra growth as
hay or with livestock, do not fertilize.
Also consider the ability of your warm-season grass to yield more. Taller warm-season grasses
like big bluestem, switchgrass, and indiangrass will respond to nitrogen better than shorter
grasses like little bluestem, sideoats grama, or blue grama.
In considering how much to apply, remember to adjust nitrogen for moisture conditions. In
eastern Nebraska, 50 to 60 pounds of nitrogen per acre works well when rain and soil moisture is
high, but during drought it may be advisable to skip fertilizing altogether. In western Nebraska
only subirrigated meadows have enough growth potential to respond to added nitrogen; there
about 40 pounds per acre will do.
Bruce AndersonFertilizing warm-season grasses
With the recent hot weather it's a good time to apply nitrogen to warm-season grasses. These
grasses will begin growing rapidly as soil and air temperature increase and adding nitrogen now
will help these grasses produce extra hay.
Extension Forage Specialist
|
When the electrical conductivity of manure effluent is greater than 3, effluent can be diluted with fresh water to reduce the salt effect if appropriate check valves (required by law) are used to prevent contamination of the fresh water source.
When diluting manure through the irrigation system, begin pumping fresh water first and then add the effluent to avoid applying effluent at full concentration.
Wind, high air temperature and/or low humidity may increase potential leaf burn. Leaf burn is less likely if liquid manure is sprinkler applied in the evening or at night, however night application may contribute to increased odors since odors do not disperse as quickly as during the morning and early afternoon hours.
Soluble salt content can be determined by having liquid manure samples analyzed by a laboratory. Producers also can take their own electrical conductivity measurements with pocket meters that are available for about $75.
In summary:
|
Guests on the Extension broadcast include Paul Jasa, NU extension engineer, and Mark Schroeder, director of farm operations at NU's Agricultural Research and Development Center at Ithaca. The program is hosted by Doug Jose, UNL ag economist and farm management specialist. Managing machinery costs is a challenge for almost every farmer, Jasa said, but every farmer looks at the challenge from a slightly different perspective.
"Some like nuts and bolts and like making repairs. They'll run a piece of equipment a lot longer than others," Jasa said. "Other producers buy a new piece of equipment any time their neighbor does."
?Knowing when to buy and what to buy is also important. NU's Mark Schroeder runs his full-size equipment until it reaches a point of maximum efficiency based on cost per acre - usually 500 to 800 hours for a combine and 1000 hours or less for a tractor. Schroeder then looks for a dealer program and sells.
“I try to wait until demand is high for good, late-model equipment,” said Schroeder. “You’ll get a higher price for something that can be turned around and sold real quickly.”
Jasa and Schroeder will talk about the logic of buying versus leasing, equipment integration, maintenance strategies, the importance of anticipating costs and the changes brought by new technologies.
The show will be broadcast live via satellite from 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. Thursday, June 13. All programs are archived at the Market Journal Web site.
|
![]()
| About Crop Watch | Agricultural News Events | Archives | Markets | Research Ag Links | Weather | Photos Search | Editor Rural Routes | Publications | IANR |
![]() | ||
| Published by University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension in the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources Cooperating with the counties and the U.S. Department of Agriculture | ||
| University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension educational programs abide with the non-discrimination policies of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and the United States Department of Agriculture. | ||